Sundance Film Festival than Going Clear: Scientology and the Prison of Belief.”

This film  “Going Clear: Scientology and the Prison of Belief” blames ACTORS TOM CRUISE & JOHN TAVOLTA for not speaking out about the abuses in this cult. Yeah, it’s a cult not a religion. Much like Muslim, Catholic or whatever.

John Tavolta wanted a career after his TV career & GREASE were over so he found KELLY PRESTON, his “wife” also a Scientology and they made him famous.

Scientology is a cult full of men and woman who are homosexuals mostly and it’s a way for them to have beards and have a career under the guise of being STRAIGHT.

I spent 1 whole day in the company of these cultist and when I slipped out they did try and contact me but I had given them all the wrong info.

Totally believable that these people APPEAR normal but they are not.

Read on because this is just going to flip you out:

=================================================

Sundance: ‘Going Clear’ Creators Say Tom Cruise and John Travolta Should Speak Out Against Scientology’s Abuses

Sundance: ‘Going Clear’ Creators Say Tom Cruise and John Travolta Should Speak Out Against Scientology’s Abuses

By Brent Lang

No documentary has inspired more controversy at this year’sSundance Film Festival than Going Clear: Scientology and the Prison of Belief.”

It’s a devastating portrait of a religion guided by greed, instead of motivated by altruism. The film alleges that Scientology abuses its rank and file, hitting them up constantly for money, while, in some cases, subjecting them to physical and psychological degradation.

It also points the finger of blame squarely at two of Scientology’s most famous practitioners, John Travolta and Tom Cruise, and shames them for turning a blind eye to the alleged mistreatments.

It’s another hot-button topic for documentary filmmaker Alex Gibney, who took on Wikileaks and Enron in previous films such as The Smartest Guys in the Room and We Steal Secrets.

Variety set down with Gibney and Lawrence Wright, the Pulitzer Prize winning journalist who wrote the book that formed the basis for the film, to discuss Scientology’s links to Hollywood, its abuse of its tax exempt status and why Cruise and other stars are vital to its survival.

Why has Tom Cruise become the symbol of this religion and how important is he to the church?

Alex Gibney: He’s vital to the church, because he is the most famous Scientologist.

He is their key guy and he is a magnet for people. Very often you’ll ask people what’s Scientology and they’ll say, ‘isn’t that the religion with Tom Cruise’? So he’s their poster boy.

Why is Scientology so entwined with the entertainment business?

Lawrence Wright:  This goes back to the founding; when L. Ron Hubbard created the Church of Scientology, he decided to make its headquarters in Hollywood, because he had a very perceptive notion that there is something that all Americans do worship and it’s celebrity and the capital of celebrity is Hollywood. He set out very early to make it a Scientology town.

They always wanted celebrities who could sell Scientology just like the people on the front of the Wheaties box.

Both the book and film are critical of celebrities like Tom Cruise and John Travolta. What culpability do they have in some of the abuses that you allege the church is guilty of?

AG: By now there is a well-documented record of abuses in the Church of Scientology, yet Cruise and Travolta have never spoken out about them. By not speaking out, it’s a kind of an endorsement and I think that’s why we’re right and properly critical.

LW: They’re selling a product and the product they’re selling is oppressing some of the people inside the church, especially the clergy, which is called the Sea Org, and Cruise has spent countless hours out on the Sea Org base where — on that same base where he has a special chateau — there’s these double wide trailers called the hole, which is a kind of re-education camp where people have been incarcerated for years. Sleeping on the floor on bedrolls with ants crawling around, abused physically, made to lick the floor or the toilet with their tongue. It’s just unbelievable degradation.

If he’s ignorant of that then it’s willful on his part.

AG: The other thing about Cruise is that he’s been the beneficiary of this unbelievably low-paid Sea Org labor. These people are being paid forty cents an hour and they’re tricking out Cruise’s cars.

LW: We hold people like Tom Cruise and John Travolta and others responsible for not demanding change inside that church.

What’s been the impact of screenwriter and director Paul Haggis’ decision to quit the church and the note he released criticizing the organization?

LW: Paul was really the vanguard. There were a lot of celebrities that had been in the church and left quietly and never really wanted to make their membership known. Paul was the first to leave loudly. He was angry.

His example has, I think, inspired many other Scientologists to look closely at the religion. And actually what is so remarkable about Paul’s story is that for 35 years he didn’t look. This is a typical story where you’re told not to look on the Internet. Don’t look at anything disparaging, so he never heard a bad word about Scientology for 34 of those 35 years.

The church has released a statement saying that you did not seek out their members for interviews and you did not give it an opportunity for comment. What’s your reaction?

AG: We reached out for interviews with the people that were relevant to our story. Scientology wanted to send us a delegation of 25 unidentified individuals, presumably to smear the people in our film. I wasn’t interested in that.

Do films and books like Going Clear feed a persecution complex on the part of Scientologists? Do they strengthen their bond to their faith?

AW: Probably it feeds a kind of persecution complex at the very top. One thing I’ve discovered over time, having done a number of films about abuses of power, is very often the most powerful people are the ones who feel the most victimized, particularly by criticism.

The testimony of a lot of these people like Paul and others who have left is actually giving tremendous comfort to many people who have been roundly abused and ultimately need the courage to leave the church, because one of the hardest things in leaving the church is to be able to recognize that you’ve made such a terrible mistake for so long.

When people do speak out, what dangers do they face?

AG: Very often they’re smeared. Very often people they work with get letters denigrating them, sometimes trying to embarrass them with pornography.

They’re spied upon 24/7.

Your film raises questions about the church’s tax exempt status. Sen. Ron Wyden is pushing to re-examine that classification by the IRS. How realistic is it that something could change?

AG: I think it’s realistic. I think it depends on the willpower.

If somebody like Sen. Wyden or others have sufficient willpower, and see what a terrible thing it is that all of us American citizens are effectively subsidizing these ongoing abuses, then maybe there will be the will to do something about it.

I’m fairly certain that a diligent investigation into the Church of Scientology would reveal that it’s not being run as a religion. It’s being run as a business.

[Yahoo editor’s note: In an earlier statement, the Church of Scientology called the accusations in the movie “entirely false and alleged without ever asking the Church” and directed readers to their longer response on the online magazine Freedom .]

DIANA RAVITCH TELLS PARENTS IN NJ TO BOYCOTT TESTING OF KIDS IN SCHOOL?

THE KIDS IN NJ ARE BASICALLY STUPID AS IT IS

AND THE EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM THAT BLEEDS TAXPAYERS AND DOESN’T PUT THAT TAX MONEY BACK INTO THE SCHOOLS

SO THE KIDS DON’T LEARN ANYTHING AND THEIR PARENTS DIDN’T LEARN ANYTHING EITHER

THAT’S HOW FAR BACK THIS PROBLEM GOES

WHAT CAN YOU EXPECT FROM A FORMER BUSH AID NAME DIANE RAVITCH WHO WAS A FORMER EDUCATOR WHO IS ALL ABOUT KEEPING THE POOR KIDS IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS DOWN

IT’S BASICALLY RACISM.

AND DIANE RAVITCH IS A REPUBLICAN WHO WORKED FOR THE GOP AND SHE HATES THE MINORITIES

AND WANTS TO BOYCOTT OVER TESTING?

WHEN I WAS IN SCHOOL I

EVERY WEEK I HAD TESTS

SO DID MY PARTNER AND SHE WAS IN PREP SCHOOL

I WAS IN CATHOLIC SCHOOL AND LET ME TELL YA I HAD A GREAT EDUCATION

AND IT PREPARED ME FOR LIFE

DIANE RAVITCH DOESN’T CARE ABOUT HELPING THE YOUTH OF AMERICA

SHE IS INTO DUMBING THEM DOWN.

JUST READ THIS BULLSHIT AND LAUGH BUT ALSO CRY

BECAUSE IF YOU ARE SINGLE OR MARRIED WITHOUT KIDS & YOU ARE PAYING $12 THOUSAND A YEAR IN TAXES

YOU SHOULD BE SCREAMING

==================================================>

SHUT UP DIANE

YOU AND CHRIS CHRISTIE ARE PSYCHOPATHIC CRAZY PEOPLE

Panel says over-testing in schools may be a problem

Posted: Jan 26, 2015 6:13 PM ESTUpdated: Jan 27, 2015 05:03 AM

Diane RavitchDiane Ravitch

By ERIC OBERNAUER   SHE’S A RACIST

eobernauer@njherald.com
A commission created by Gov. Chris Christie to review “the volume, frequency and impact of student assessments” in New Jersey schools has stopped short of finding fault with the upcoming PARCC assessments, but has released findings that could still embolden the growing numbers of parents locally who say they will not allow their children to sit for the tests, which begin in March.

The interim report, which was released Friday, indicated the totality of classroom time spent on testing and test preparation could be crowding out instructional time and recommended that schools review the entire body of assessments being given in classrooms.

The nine-member commission, which was chaired by state Education Commissioner David Hespe, found that the volume of testing, “if not constantly reviewed for redundancy or quality, may be problematic in terms of limiting instructional time or detracting from the student experience.”

The computer-based PARCC assessments — whose content is intended to mirror the new Common Core State Standards — were developed on behalf of a consortium of states known as the Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers. The first round of testing will be done on select days between March 2 and March 27, and the second between April 27 and May 22.

But much like Common Core itself, which critics have derided as a one-size-fits-all intrusion into public education, the PARCC assessments have generated considerable angst among parents who question if their children will be fully prepared for the new tests and among teachers who fear the results could be given disproportionate weight in evaluating their job performance.

At last week’s meeting of the Andover Regional Board of Education, three parents — all of whom asked that their names not be published — told school officials they will not allow their children to take the tests in March.

And in Hopatcong, parent Ruth Fouda has said she plans to do the same and has spearheaded an anti-PARCC petition drive that several other parents have signed. Members of the group have also launched a Facebook page,Parents Against Core Testing (P.A.C.T.), and have said they intend to picket a PARCC informational session the school district has scheduled for Feb. 4.

“I don’t have an issue with testing in general, but there is a tremendous amount of time that’s being taken away from education because of the amount of time that’s being spent on test preparation, which started before the Christmas break, where more than half of their curriculum was turned over to PARCC preparation,” Fouda said.

Mike Yaple, a spokesman for the state Department of Education, said in an email last month that the PARCC assessments will give parents meaningful feedback on how their children are performing — an element he said was missing from the NJ ASK and other paper-and-pencil tests.

But Fouda rejects that argument and expressed concern that her children and others, including those with special needs, will be expected to demonstrate reading proficiency up to two grades above their actual grade level.

Diane Ravitch, a former U.S. assistant education secretary under President George H.W. Bush — and one of the most prolific writers on education policy of the last 30 years — also has weighed in on the subject and has said bluntly that the tests should be boycotted.

Ravitch, currently a professor at New York University’s School of Education, told the New Jersey Herald in an email recently that “I support boycotting the tests for several reasons,” saying that American students are over-tested.

“Other nations test students three times in the course of their K-12 progression, not annually,” she wrote, adding that some high-performing countries like Finland have no standardized tests. (THEY ALSO HAVE VERY HIGH RATIO OF TEACHER TO STUDENTS MEANING THAT THE CLASSES ARE SMALL AND THE TEACHERS CAN ACTUALLY TEACH THEIR SUBJECTS TO KIDS WHO ARE LISTENING)

Ravitch also described as “absurdly high” the standards for earning a score of “proficient” on PARCC and said the passing marks are a guarantee that many if not most students will fail. (because they are minority students bunched into one classroom with more than 10 students in the class. how can you learn like that? If they do fail these tests You test them more NOT LESS or you TEACH THEM MORE) 

Even before Friday’s report was issued, several school districts had already begun reviewing and, in some cases, eliminating some of their tests.

Several high schools, including High Point Regional and Wallkill Valley Regional, have done away with final exams. (try getting into or surviving college. oh I see you don’t want them in college. you want slaves picking the fields. you want them dumb and stupid and in jail and in shitty jobs)

Wallkill Valley Interim Superintendent Bob Walker, who retired from Kittatinny Regional in 2007, said recently that he was shocked at the amount of testing being done and the stress it is causing young people.

“I could not believe the number of young people being affected by stress and on meds,” he said, adding that other tests such as the SAT, ACT, and advanced placement exams would more than take the place of finals.

In the meantime, three public hearings — one of which was to have been held Monday at Camden County College in Blackwood but was cancelled because of snow — will allow the public to weigh in on PARCC and other tests. A rescheduled date for that session will be announced shortly. The other two sessions will be 4 p.m. Wednesday at Franklin Williams Middle School in Jersey City and 6 p.m. Thursday at Jackson Liberty High School in Jackson.

Testimony also can be submitted via email at studycommission@doe.state.nj.us or online athttp://www.state.nj.us/education/studycommission/contact.shtml. Details can be obtained by visiting the commission’s web page on the state Department of Education website.

Eric Obernauer can also be contacted on Twitter: @EricObernNJH or by phone at 973-383-1213.

=====================================================================>
  • Linda Franz-Ankrom · Texas Christian University

    It would be one thing if the results of these tests were actually beneficial to the students. However, the year that one of my kids scored low, the results came at the end of the summer, 4 months after she took the test….we could have spent the whole summer remediating her in preparation for the upcoming school year. Instead, she wasted the whole summer vacationing and then was stuck in a remedial class for the whole school year. When I asked if we could get the results sooner the following year, I was told that was not possible. It has occurred to me that perhaps the people who score the tests are teachers looking for summertime employment. In any event, the scores seem useless to individual students, and are perhaps only useful for compiling statistics.
  • George Fajvan · Rutgers University

    moving from NJASK to PARRC is going from bad to worse. From a user interface perspective, the PARRC fails. We need to redirect the funding from standardized testing to the schools themselves. The teachers are capable of educating our students without the need for a centralized standardized testing to compile metrics. Success can be measured without a costly disruptive standardized test.

I WAS THREATENED BY A ACTOR ON FACEBOOK 2 TAKE DOWN MY BLOG ABOUT THE TURKS

AND THEN MY WORDPRESS BLOG WAS SHUT DOWN DUE TO A SECURITY BREACH – IT WAS REINSTATED ONCE I TOLD WORDPRESS WHAT HAPPENED AND THAT I THOUGHT

GUILLE CAMEO M is a hacker

HIS FACEBOOK PAGE SAYS HE is an actor living in NYC and is friends with  https://www.facebook.com/guille.c.m.3

ESIN VARAN

A TURK WHOM I HAD A FIGHT WITH ON FACEBOOK

THEY ARE BOTH MEMBERS OF THIS FB GROUP:

NEW YORK CITY CASTINGS FOR PRODUCERS & ACTORS LOOKING FOR TALENT

IF SHE KNEW THAT HE HACKED MY WORD PRESS & SHE THOUGHT THAT WAS GOOD OR SHE PUT HIM UP TO IT FOR

PUSSY FAVORS – BUT DON’T QUOTE ME – OBVIOUSLY HE IS EITHER FAVORS MUSLIMS, FUCKING THIS GIRL OR WANTED TO BE A KNIGHT IN SHINING ARMOUR

I BELIEVE THAT GUILLE CAMEO M HACKED MY wordpress ACCOUNT & before he did so he sent me THIS MESSAGE:

If you don’t take out this blog, threatening and inciting people to commit a crime and terrorism NOW, you will be reported to the police tomorrow morning.
Everybody has different opinions, everybody should respect yours, you should respect everybody’s.
1st warning

====================================================

I got a message from WORDPRESS saying I had an CODE ERROR 493 – I have no idea what that was about but I realized I WAS HACKED

THIS IS A CRIME, GUILLE. who lives in NYC and is friends for the last 2 weeks with this turkish WOMAN who obviously complained to him about me.  Meanwhile they have only known each other for 2 weeks.

From the 26 year old Turk who denied everything ABOUT THE ARMENIAN MASSACRE.

I WILL NEVER BE SILENCED.

PLEASE BE AWARE I HAVE TRACKED THIS GUY DOWN AND WE NOW HAVE HIS LOCATION. THIS HAS BEEN GIVEN TO FACEBOOK, WORD PRESS & THE NYC POLICE.

ARMENIANS WILL NEVER BE SILENCED. 

WE WILL NEVER BE SILENCED

WE WILL CONTINUE TO TELL THE TRUTH ABOUT TURKS

NO MATTER HOW MUCH THEY DENY THE MASSACRES

IT WAS NOT A WAR

IT WAS A GENOCIDE

I STAND IN SUPPORT OF ANY GROUP OR RACE OF CULTURE WHO IS BEING GENOCIDE D AGAINST

THIS IS NOT A WAR

THIS IS

RETRIBUTION

================================

 

 

RUSSIA STILL SUPPORTING REBELS & NOW UKRAINE GETS FUCKED – AGAIN?

Rocket fire kills 30 Ukrainian citizens by Russian Rebels who are being supported by RUSSIAN CZAR PUTIN THAT PUTZ!

====================================================>

Rocket Fire Kills 30 Civilians In Ukrainian City Of Mariupol

KIEV, Ukraine (AP) — Indiscriminate rocket fire slammed into a market, schools, homes and shops Saturday in Ukraine’s southeastern city of Mariupol, killing at least 30 people, authorities said. The Ukrainian president called the blitz a terrorist attack and NATO and the U.S. demanded that Russia stop supporting the rebels.

Ukrainian officials rushed to defend the strategically important port on the Sea of Azov, beefing up military positions with more equipment and sending in more forces.

The separatists’ top leader declared that an offensive against Mariupol had begun — then later toned down his threats as the scale of the civilian casualties became clear.

President Petro Poroshenko held an emergency meeting of his military officials and cut short a trip to Saudi Arabia to coordinate the government’s response.

“The time has come to name their sponsors. The help given to militants, weapons deliveries, equipment and the training of manpower — is this not aiding terrorism?” Poroshenko said in a recorded statement.

Russia insists it does not support the rebels, but Western military officials say the sheer number of heavy weapons under rebel control belies that claim.

An AP reporter saw convoys of pristine heavy weapons in rebel territory earlier this week.

The rocket attacks came a day after the rebels rejected a peace deal and announced they were going on a multi-prong offensive against the government in Kiev to vastly increase their territory. The rebel stance has upended European attempts to mediate an end to the fighting in eastern Ukraine, which the U.N. says has killed nearly 5,100 people since April.

Mariupol, a major city under government control, lies between mainland Russia and the Russia-annexed Crimean Peninsula. Heavy fighting in the region in the fall raised fears that Russian-backed separatist forces would try to capture city to establish a land link between Russia and Crimea.

Ukraine’s Defense Ministry said three separate strikes from Grad multiple-rocket launchers hit Mariupol and its surrounding areas Saturday.

“The area that came under attack was massive,” Mariupol mayor Yuriy Khotlubei said. “The shelling was carried out by militants. This is very clearly Russian aggression that has caused terrible losses for the residents of the eastern part of our city.”

The Donetsk regional government loyal to Kiev said at least 30 people — including a 15-year old girl and a five-year old boy — died in the attacks. A Ukrainian military checkpoint near the city was also hit and one serviceman was killed, the Defense Ministry said.

The RIA Novosti news agency cited Ukrainian rebel leader Alexander Zakharchenko as saying an offensive had begun on Mariupol. He spoke as he laid a wreath Saturday where at least eight civilians died when a bus stop was shelled Thursday in Donetsk, the largest rebel-held city in eastern Ukraine.

Zakharchenko swiftly backtracked, however. He denied that his forces were responsible for Saturday’s carnage, saying it was caused by Ukrainian error. He also said the Ukrainian defenses positions around Mariupol would be destroyed but the city itself would not be stormed.

But the Organization for Security and Cooperation’s monitoring mission said the attack on Mariupol was caused by Grad and Uragan rockets fired from areas under rebel control.

Rebel forces have positions 10 kilometers (six miles) from Mariupol’s eastern outskirts. On Jan. 13, a bus near an army checkpoint north of Mariupol was hit by a shell, killing 13 people, an attack Ukraine also blamed on the separatists.

Yulia, a Mariupol citizen who asked that her name not be used for fear of retaliation, told The Associated Press by telephone Saturday that her stricken neighborhood had no power or heat in the middle of winter due to the attacks. Many residents had boarded up their windows, fearing shattered glass from further attacks, she said.

Reinforcements were being drafted into the city and the Mariupol-based Azov Battalion was being equipped with more heavy weapons, Interior Minister Arsen Avakov said in a posting on Facebook. Security services also detained a spotter suspected of giving rebel fighters coordinates to launch rockets, he said.

Prime Minister Arseniy Yatsenyuk had ordered regional leaders Friday to draw up economic blueprints to put the financially struggling country on a war footing. Ukraine began its fourth wave of mobilization this week, building up manpower for its faltering war effort.

Fighting has also been intensifying for the government-held town of Debaltseve, 50 kilometers (31 miles) east of Donetsk. The main roads into the town are under separatist control and rebels have vowed to surround the Ukrainian forces stationed there.

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry said the rebels’ new offensive “has been aided and abetted by Russia’s irresponsible and dangerous decision to resupply them in recent weeks with hundreds of new pieces of advanced weaponry.”

“I join my European counterparts in condemning in the strongest terms today’s horrific assault by Russia-backed separatists on civilian neighborhoods in Mariupol,” Kerry said in a statement, citing reports of dozens wounded as well.

He urged Russia to close its international border with Ukraine and withdraw all weapons, fighters and financial backing from the separatists or face increased U.S. and international pressure. The European Union and the U.S. have already hit Russia with sanctions for its actions in Ukraine, moves that have hurt the Russian economy.

EU foreign affairs chief Federica Mogherini echoed Kerry’s demands.

NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg also condemned the Mariupol shelling and what he called the increased presence of Russian forces in Ukraine.

“Russian troops in eastern Ukraine are supporting these offensive operations with command-and-control systems, air defense systems with advanced surface-to-air missiles, unmanned aerial systems, advanced multiple rocket launcher systems and electronic warfare systems,” he said.

On Saturday, Russia blocked a Western-backed Security Council statement that would have condemned the indiscriminant shelling of Mariupol.

Russia’s U.N. Mission said in statement there was no agreement because Britain insisted on condemnation of separatist “self-defense forces” who are backed by Russia. It said Western council members have never condemned any statements or actions by Ukraine’s government.

A peace deal signed in September in the Belarusian capital of Minsk envisaged a cease-fire and a pullout of heavy weapons from a division line in eastern Ukraine, but that was repeatedly violated by both sides. Foreign ministers from Russia, Ukraine, France and Germany agreed Wednesday to revive that division line but the rebels on Friday rejected the whole Minsk deal.

Senior envoys from Ukraine, Russia and the OSCE issued a statement Saturday convening an urgent meeting next week to restart the Minsk peace process.

__

Raf Casert in Brussels and Yuras Karmanau in Kiev, Ukraine, contributed to this report.

LOUISIANA GOV BOBBY JINDEL ENDORSES TED CRUZ PUSH TO BAN SAME SEX MARRIAGE

I WANT TO BAN ALL INDIANS IN AMERICA FROM LIVING HERE IN AMERICA

I WANT TO SEND THEM ALL BACK TO PUNJAB IMMEDIATELY

TED CRUZ IS A CANADIAN – I WANT TO FORCE HIS DUMB ASS WIFE TO MOVE BACK TO CANADA WITH DUMB ASS TED

THEY CAN NO LONGER LIVE IN MY AMERICA.

–============================================================>

bobby jindel is one man short in his marriage. He needs to leave America or go in a box and take his ugly ass wife and kids with him.

THIS IS UNAMERICAN TO DISALLOW AMERICAN CITIZENS THE RIGHT TO MARRY. IT’S DOWNRIGHT DISGUSTING.

JUST LOOK AT THIS MONKEE – HE NEEDS TO GO BACK TO INDIA

Bobby Jindal Endorses Ted Cruz’s Push To Ban Same-Sex Marriage

Posted: 01/25/2015 12:54 pm EST Updated: 2 hours ago
 fugly indian cocksucker without a dick – die Jindal DIE
and his butt fucking lover
the canadian butthurt cocksucking cuntaloon

Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal (R) said Sunday he would support an amendment to the Constitution that would enable state legislatures to outlaw same-sex marriage if the U.S. Supreme Court were to overturn various state bans.

“If the Supreme Court were to throw out our law, our constitutional amendment — I hope they wouldn’t do that — if they were to do that, I certainly will support Ted Cruz and others that are talking about making … a constitutional amendment to allow states to continue to define marriage,” Jindal said on ABC’s “This Week,” referring to Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas).

Gay Americans are unable to marry the partner of their choice in more than a dozen states. Jindal’s home state defines marriage as between a man and a woman, and he argued that the ban on same-sex marriage was not tantamount to intentional state-sponsored discrimination.

“I believe that marriage is between a man and a woman,” Jindal said. “My faith teaches me that, my Christian faith teaches me that. I’m not for discrimination against anybody. I know that many politicians are evolving, so-called evolving on this issue based on the polls. I don’t change my views based on the polls.”

The Supreme Court this month said it would decide on gay-rights cases that seek to enable same-sex marriage across the country. The cases will be argued in April. A decision is expected in June.

About three dozen states allow people to marry their partners regardless of their sex. Courts in states led by Republicans have been among those calling for an end to bans on same-sex marriage.

SHARIA LAW COMES TO DEARBORN MICHIGAN IN THE FORM OF A HABIB-BITCH TAKE IT OFF!

BITCH TAKE IT OFF

NO EXCEPTIONS TO THIS RULE

YOU ARE A MUSLIM AND YOU WERE ARRESTED FOR NOT PAYING YOUR TRAFFIC TICKETS

YOU HAD TO TAKE A BOOKING PHOTO AND BECAUSE THE POLICE MADE YOU TAKE OFF YOUR SCARF

YOU ARE GOING TO CLOG UP OUR ALREADY FULL DOCKETS WITH A LAWSUIT?

FUCK YOU MUSLIM CUNT

GO BACK TO YOUR COUNTRY

DEARBORN COPS PLEASE FORCE HER TO PAY HER DEBT AND THEN DEPORT HER

DEPORT HER AND OTHERS LIKE HER

OUR LAWS ARE FOR EVERYONE

SCREW HER RELIGIOUS BULLSHIT

PAY YOUR FINES

AND GO BACK TO ONE OF YOUR 22 ARAB NATIONS

WE DON’T WANT YOU HERE

and take your muslim attorney with you Amir Makled

======================================================>

Muslim Woman Sues Police For Forcing Her To Remove Hijab

Posted: 01/25/2015 8:00 am EST Updated: 01/25/2015 8:00 am EST
MALAK KAZAN 

A Muslim woman who was forced to remove her hijab by police in Michigan claims her religious rights were violated, and she’s hoping a civil rights lawsuit will ensure other women don’t have the same experience.

Malak Kazan, 27, is suing the police department and city of Dearborn Heights, a suburb of Detroit, after officers refused her request to keep her headscarf on while taking a booking photo. Her attorney Amir Makled filed the lawsuit in federal court Thursday.

“Malak has been very brave by going forward with this case,” Makled told The Huffington Post. “It’s something that’s going to be heightened exposure for her, and she’s kind of already suffered a little bit of backlash … The level of racism that’s out there, that she has witnessed on some of these websites [that covered her case], it’s been very upsetting to her. But she still carries on and is still proud to be a trailblazer for a just cause.”

Kazan was stopped for a traffic violation in Dearborn Heights on July 9, and was then arrested; Makled says her license had been suspended for outstanding traffic tickets. The lawsuit states that at the police station she was asked to remove her headscarf, which she wears in public and when she is in the presence of men who aren’t family members, for her booking photo. When she told the unnamed officer that to do so would violate her religious beliefs, he said there were no exceptions. She spoke with his supervisor, who also allegedly refused her request.

Kazan says she then requested that a female officer take the photograph, which was also denied. The lawsuit alleges the first officer then threatened her with further detention if she didn’t comply.

The suit claims Kazan experienced “extreme shame, humiliation, mental anguish, and emotional distress” when she was forced to remove her hijab.

“To Ms. Kazan, wearing a headscarf is a reminder of her faith, the importance of modesty in her religion, and her religious obligations, as well as a symbol of her own control over who may see the more intimate parts of her body,” the lawsuit states.

Kazan’s lawsuit calls on the police department to change its policy to allow headscarves worn for religious purposes and to provide training about the change.

“She doesn’t want to have other women [undergo similar experiences],” Makled said. “It’s a women’s rights issue as well as a Muslim rights issue.”

Dearborn Heights Police Chief Lee Gavin, who is named in Kazan’s lawsuit, did not return a request for comment but told FOX 2 that the department requires individuals to remove hats and other head coverings for safety reasons, as they can “contain concealable items that could pose a threat or chance of injury to the cops or to themselves.” He said procedure is to have women remove hijabs in the presence of a female officer, but there aren’t always enough female officers at the station.

“Our number one concern is security of our officers and the prisoners,” Gavin said.

Makled said from a legal standpoint, the police department would have to have a compelling reason in order to not make accommodations for a person’s religious practice, and he doesn’t believe that was the case in this incident.

The city had not been served with the lawsuit as of Friday afternoon, Dearborn Heights Corporation Counsel Gary Miotke told HuffPost. He said he couldn’t knowledgeably comment until he had seen the allegations.

The Detroit area has one of the highest concentrations of Arab-Americans in the country, with a particularly strong community in Dearborn, adjacent to Dearborn Heights. In the last several years, Dearborn Heights’ Arab-American population has grown significantly, according to the Arab American News.

In December, the Arab-American Civil Rights League filed a different lawsuit against the city on behalf of a family who allege the police department discriminated against them, making anti-Arab remarks and retaliating when they complained.

In nearby cities and around the country, other Muslim women have faced circumstances similar to Kazan’s, being forced to remove headscarves worn for religious reasons while detained. Safety appears to be the primary reason cited for those rules, but, in recent years some departments — including Washington, D.C. police — have changed policies to allow women to keep their headscarves on in custody.

Another agency that now allows headscarves is the Orange County Sheriff’s Department in California. In 2007, Anaheim resident Souhair Khatib sued after officers at a courthouse holding cell compelled her to remove her hijab for security reasons. The civil rights lawsuit was settled in 2013, and the OCSD changed their policy to allow religious headscarves, conducting trainings about the change.

THESE MUSLIM PRICKS NEED TO GET LOST.

==============================================================

WHAT OTHERS ARE SAYING ABOUT THIS CASE:

Joe Tighe · · Austin, Texas

I just do not see where requiring her to remove her hijab is infringing on her rights. She broke the law, was arrested and had to have a mug shot taken full face as is the rule. Don’t break the law and you won’t have to have a mug shot taken. as far as “It’s a women’s rights issue as well as a Muslim rights issue.” I beg to differ on both counts. Women certainly have the right to wear head coverings if they want. Once they break the law they become subject to other rules and have to follow the rules the same as if a Jewish man were arrested and had to remove his yarmulke for a mug shot. And as far as “Muslim rights” go, nowhere in the US Bill of Rights or the US Constituition does the word “muslim” appear. There are no “muslim” rights in the United States. US citizens have rights and even if she is a US citizen, “muslim rights” do not exist. Lastly, if you don’t like it then leave the country.

REMEMBER SUPERSTORM SANDY – THAT FELL ON A MERCURY RETROGRADE

SUPER STORM SANDY FELL ON OCTOBER 29, 2012

And the next Mercury Retrograde period (October 29, 2012)

WELCOME TO HELL

TOMORROW IS MONDAY JANUARY 25 2015

IT IS THE 6TH DAY OF THE 3 WEEK RETROGRADE

remember if u lose power to turn on all your facets and let them drip so your pipes won’t freeze us and burst.

Go out and buy bottled water and food

NYC, NJ & THE TRI STATE AREA IS BRACING FOR THIS STUPID ASS MON/TUESDAY STORM

I’M UNHAPPY THAT IT’S GOING TO CUT INTO MY WORK WEEK

BUT BOSTON IS SAID GONNA BE HIT HARD TOO

GOOD LUCK PEOPLE

STAY SAFE OUT THERE

WHY ARE WE IN THE USA NOT DOING SQAT TO HELP THE NIGERIANS FIGHT BOKO HARAM?

BOKO HARAM ARE ISLAMIC BLACK FUCKING MUSLIMS CREATING A GENOCIDE AGAINST THEIR OWN PEOPLE

THEY KIDNAP YOUNG WOMEN AND CHILDREN AND SELL THEM, SWAP THEM, RAPE THEM, MARRY THEM OFF TO OLD MEN SOME OF THESE KIDS ARE UNDER 10 YEARS OLD

THEY WILL NEVER KNOW A KIND WORD

THEY WATCHED THEIR PARENTS MURDERED

THIS IS THE ISLAMIC WAY

THIS IS THE WAY OF COWARDS

WE HAVE TO GO AND HELP THEM

WE MUST STAND AGAINST ISLAM

WE MUST STAND AGAINST TURKEY

WE MUST STAND AGAINST ISIS

WE MUST MAKE THEM DISAPPEAR LIKE THE ACT OF A MAGICIAN

WE HAVE TO MAKE AN EFFORT TO KILL THEM OFF

NOW

BEFORE THEY GET TOO STRONG

AND TRY AND KILL US OFF

BUT NOTHING WILL MAKE ME HAPPIER THAN TO ONE DAY KILL MY SHARE OF NIGGER BLACK MUSLIMS AND TURKS

NOTHING WILL COMPARE TO THE JOY I WILL HAVE IN SLAYING THESE PIGS

COOKING THEIR BODIES

AND FEEDING THEM TO THE PIGS

WHY SHOULDN’T PIGS HAVE A WARM MIDDLE EASTERN MEAL?

============================================================>

WOMEN WHO HAVE ESCAPED THESE FIENDS ARE TELLING AUTHORITIES THAT THESE PIGS ARE BUSY RAPING ALL THE WOMEN AND CHILDREN THEY HAVE KIDNAPPED

NIGERIA IS TELLING THE UN THAT THEY DON’T NEED OUR HELP

BUT THEY DO

WE HAVE TO HELP SAVE THESE PEOPLE FROM BEING GENOCIDAL AGAINST AND THAT TIME IS NOW!

Boko Haram Attacks Nigeria’s Maiduguri as Kerry Flies to Lagos

Annotate the News: Boko Haram Massacres

NOWTHIS NEWS

Suspected Boko Haram militants attacked the northern Nigerian city of Maiduguri on Sunday, hours before Secretary of State John Kerry was due to arrive in the country on a visit, officials told NBC News.

The fighters began attacking the outskirts of the city at around 1 a.m. local time (7 p.m. ET Saturday), according to Bulama Mali Gubio, spokesperson for the Borno Elders’ Forum.

It came hours after the country’s president, Goodluck Jonathan, made an election campaign visit to the city.

Kerry, the first U.S. diplomat to travel to Nigeria since 2012, was heading to Lagos, more than 1,000 miles to the south.

Maiduguri is the capital of Borno state, and would be a major prize for Boko Haram insurgents, who are trying to carve out an Islamic state within Nigeria. Boko Haram has waged a five-year insurgency to carve out an Islamic state in the northeast of Africa’s biggest economy.

Bulama, who spoke to NBC News via telephone from inside the city, said that he could hear explosions from the area where the military was engaging the insurgents

Nigeria’s military claimed on Twitter that its troops were repelling simultaneous attacks on Maiduguri and the town of Monguno some 60 miles north.

It said a temporary curfew had been imposed on Maiduguri. The attack was also confirmed by Borno state Senator Ahmed Zanna

Thousands of residents fled to Maiduguri after an attack on the fishing town of Baga at the start of January that was believed to be the deadliest ever by Boko Haram.

THE TURKS ARE NOT AMERICA’S ALLIES AS THEY ARE HARBORING ISIS MEMBERS

PLANES ARE DISAPPEARING AND SUDDENLY THEY ARE SEEN IN ….. TURKEY

THE FRENCH NEWSPAPER OFFICE GETS BOMBED & THE BITCH WHO WAS INVOLVED DISAPPEARS BUT IS SEEN WALKING OFF A PLANE INTO…. TURKEY

TURKISH GOVERNMENT MAKES NOTE OF PROMINENT PEOPLE IN THE UNITED STATES THAT PROVOKE THEM. WHO PROTEST THEIR INCLUSION INTO THE EU WHICH THEY HAVE NOT BEEN ACCEPTED

THE REASON THE FRENCH WERE TARGETED IS BECAUSE OF FRANCE’S STANCE AGAINST TURKEY ON BEHALF OF THE ARMENIAN PEOPLE

FRANCE DEMANDS THAT TURKEY COME CLEAN ABOUT THE ARMENIAN MASSACRE. TURKEY LIES TO ITSELF, TO ITS PEOPLE, TO ITS CHILDREN

THEY TELL THE WORLD THAT THE ARMENIANS PERSECUTED THEM.

WHEN THAT DIDN’T WORK THEY THEN SAID THAT THE TURKS OF THE OTTOMAN EMPIRE – THE YOUNG TURKS AND THE ARMENIANS WERE INVOLVED IN A WAR.

THIS IS TOTAL HORSE SHIT. 

FOR A WAR TO HAPPEN BOTH SIDES MUST BE ARMED ACCORDINGLY

NO THIS WAS VERY MUCH LIKE THE ARMENIANS HAVING NO ARMS TO DEFEND THEMSELVES AND THE TURKS HAVING SWORDS, KILLING THEM, CHOPPING OFF HEADS, BURYING MEN UP TO THEIR NECKS AND HAVING THEIR HORSES TROD UPON THEM STAMPEDING THEM TO DEATH

THE TURKS ARE NOT THE ALLIES OF THE UNITED STATES

THEY SUPPLY GUNS AND AMMO TO THE BOKA HARRUM NIGGERS WHO ARE RUNNING OVER THEIR OWN PEOPLE IN A GENOCIDE THAT NO ONE IS PAYING ATTENTION TO.

THE WORLD HAS GOT TO WAKE THE FUCK UP AND HELP THE NIGERIANS AND THE AFRICANS AND STOP THESE MUSLIM PIGS FROM KILLING THEM OFF INTO OBLIVION. 

THE TURKS ARE UNLOVED, THE TURKS ARE UNDER APPRECIATED (their words)

THE TURKS CLAIM MANY GREEK AND ARMENIAN DELICACIES AS THEIR OWN

THIS IS BULLSHIT. THE TURKS DON’T HAVE ANYTHING OF THEIR OWN – THEY ARE NOMADS, THEY ARE THIEVES, THEY ARE BULLSHIT ARTISTS AND THEY ARE RAPISTS.

THE MOORS (ALSO KNOWN AS THE TURKS) HAVE MURDERED JUST AS MANY HUMAN BEING ON EARTH AS THE CHRISTIAN BROTHERS – THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH. 

THE TURKS DO IT DIFFERENTLY –

FOR ALL I KNOW THESE PEOPLE IN THESE PICTURES ARE MY RELATIVES: I HATE THE TURKS

Pictures of surviving kids from Adana, with their knees broken and parts of their body cut off

Armenian Genocide Begins With Large-Scale Deportations

Statistics: Before the war: 2 million Armenians in the Ottoman Empire. 1-1.5 million died during the war. Less than 400,000 were left in the Ottoman Empire …

THE PIG TURKS – MAY THEY LIVE IN HELL FOR ETERNITY

THE ARMENIAN GENOCIDE 1915 TO 2015 – 100 YEARS OF DENIAL ON PART OF TURKS

TURKS ARE PISSED OFF AT ME FOR TELLING THE TRUTH

THE TURKS ARE ANIMALS

THEY MASSACRED THE ARMENIANS

TURKS ARE HARBORING ISIS MEMBERS

NOW I’M BEING THREATENED BY THEM

HERE IS AN EXAMPLE ON FACEBOOK – I WILL NEVER BE SILENT

HERE IS A MAN I JUST BLOCKED ON FACEBOOK

HE IS FROM SPAIN BUT HE IS A TURK:

======================================================>

HIS NAME IS:

Guille Cameo M

THIS IS WHAT HE WROTE:

If you don’t take out this blog, threatening and inciting people to commit a crime and terrorism NOW, you will be reported to the police tomorrow morning.
Everybody has different opinions, everybody should respect yours, you should respect everybody’s.
1st warning
18 minutes ago
freedom of speech. I reported you for threatening me. Wasting police time is jail sentence for you. get lost
I know you live in NYC. on your site. U re in trouble now
==========================================================>
 TO EVERY TURK TODAY THAT DENIES THERE WAS EVER A GENOCIDE IS GUILTY OF IT JUST AS THEIR ANCESTORS WERE GUILTY IN COMMITTING THESE MILLIONS OF MURDERS

I WILL NEVER BE SILENT.

Armenian Genocide

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Armenian Genocide
Part of the persecution of Armenians

Contents

 [hide

Armenian civilians, escorted by armed Ottoman soldiers, are marched through Harput (Kharpert), to a prison in the nearby Mezireh (present-day Elâzığ), April 1915.
Location Ottoman Empire
Date 1915[note 1]
Target Armenian population
Attack type
Deportation, mass murder
Deaths 1.5 million[note 2]
Perpetrators Committee of Union and Progress (Young Turks)

The Armenian Genocide[7] (Armenian: Հայոց Ցեղասպանություն Hayots Tseghaspanutyun),[8] also known as the Armenian Holocaust, theArmenian Massacres and, traditionally by Armenians, as Medz Yeghern (Armenian: Մեծ Եղեռն, “Great Crime”),[9] was the Ottoman government’s systematic extermination of its minority Armenian subjects from their historic homeland within the territory constituting the present-day Republic of Turkey. The starting date is conventionally held to be 24 April 1915, the day Ottoman authorities rounded up and arrested some 250 Armenian intellectuals and community leaders in Constantinople. The genocide was carried out during and after World War I and implemented in two phases: the wholesale killing of the able-bodied male population through massacre and subjection of army conscripts to forced labour, followed by the deportation of women, children, the elderly and infirm on death marches leading to the Syrian desert. Driven forward by military escorts, the deportees were deprived of food and water and subjected to periodic robbery, rape, and massacre.[10][11][12] The total number of people killed as a result has been estimated at between 1 and 1.5 million. Other indigenous and Christian ethnic groups such as the Assyrians and the Ottoman Greeks were similarly targeted for extermination by the Ottoman government, and their treatment is considered by many historians to be part of the same genocidal policy.[13][14][15] The majority of Armenian diaspora communities around the world came into being as a direct result of the genocide.

Raphael Lemkin was explicitly moved by the Armenian annihilation to coin the word genocide in 1943 and define systematic and premeditated exterminations within legal parameters.[16] The Armenian Genocide is acknowledged to have been one of the first modern genocides,[17][18][19]because scholars point to the organized manner in which the killings were carried out in order to eliminate the Armenians,[20] and it is the second most-studied case of genocide after the Holocaust.[21]

Turkey, the successor state of the Ottoman Empire, denies the word genocide is an accurate term for the mass killings of Armenians that began under Ottoman rule in 1915.[22] It has in recent years been faced with repeated calls to recognize them as genocide. To date, 23 countries have officially recognized the mass killings as genocide, a view which is shared by most genocide scholars and historians.[23][24][25][26]

Armenian Genocide
Part of the persecution of Armenians
Armenians marched by Turkish soldiers, 1915.png

Armenian civilians, escorted by armed Ottoman soldiers, are marched through Harput (Kharpert), to a prison in the nearby Mezireh (present-day Elâzığ), April 1915.
Location Ottoman Empire
Date 1915[note 1]
Target Armenian population
Attack type
Deportation, mass murder
Deaths 1.5 million[note 2]
Perpetrators Committee of Union and Progress (Young Turks)

Background

Armenians under Ottoman rule

Armenia had come largely under Ottoman rule during the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries. The vast majority of Armenians, grouped together under the name Armenian millet (community) and led by their spiritual head, the Armenian Patriarch of Constantinople, were concentrated in the eastern provinces of the Ottoman Empire (commonly referred to as Turkish Armenia or Western Armenia), although large communities were also found in the western provinces, as well as in the capital Constantinople. The Armenian community was made up of three religious denominations: the Armenian Apostolic to which the overwhelming majority of Armenians belonged, and the Armenian Catholic and Armenian Protestant communities. Through the millet system, the Armenian community were allowed to rule themselves under their own system of governance with fairly little interference from the Ottoman government. With the exception of the empire’s urban centers and the extremely wealthy, Constantinople-based Amira class, a social elite whose members included the Duzians (Directors of the Imperial Mint), the Balyans (Chief Imperial Architects) and the Dadians (Superintendent of the Gunpowder Mills and manager of industrial factories), most Armenians – approximately 70% of their population – lived in poor and dangerous conditions in the rural countryside.[27][28] Ottoman census figures clash with the statistics collected by the Armenian Patriarchate. According to the latter, there were three million Armenians living in the empire in 1878 (400,000 in Constantinople and the Balkans, 600,000 in Asia Minor and Cilicia, 670,000 in Lesser Armenia and the area near Kayseri, and 1,300,000 in Western Armenia itself).[29]

In the eastern provinces, the Armenians were subject to the whims of their Turkish and Kurdish neighbors, who would regularly overtax them, subject them to brigandage and kidnapping, force them to convert to Islam, and otherwise exploit them without interference from central or local authorities.[28] In the Ottoman Empire, in accordance with the dhimmi system implemented in Muslim countries, they, like all other Christians and also Jews, were accorded certain limited freedoms (such as the right to worship), but were in essence treated as second-class citizens and referred to in Turkish as gavours, a pejorative word meaning “infidel” or “unbeliever”.[30] Writing in the late 1890s after a visit to the Ottoman Empire, the British ethnographer William Ramsay described the conditions of Armenian life as follows:

We must, however, go back to an older time, if we want to appreciate what uncontrolled Turkish rule meant, alike to Armenians and to Greeks. It did not mean religious persecution; it meant unutterable contempt … They were dogs and pigs; and their nature was to be Christians, to be spat upon, if their shadow darkened a Turk, to be outraged, to be the mats on which he wiped the mud from his feet. Conceive the inevitable result of centuries of slavery, of subjection to insult and scorn, centuries in which nothing that belonged to the Armenian, neither his property, his house, his life, his person, nor his family, was sacred or safe from violence – capricious, unprovoked violence – to resist which by violence meant death![31]

In addition to other legal limitations, Christians were not considered equals to Muslims: testimony against Muslims by Christians and Jews was inadmissible in courts of law; they were forbidden to carry weapons or ride atop horses; their houses could not overlook those of Muslims; and their religious practices were severely circumscribed (e.g., the ringing of church bells was strictly forbidden).[32]Violation of these statutes could result in punishments ranging from the levying of exorbitant fines to execution.

Reform implementation, 1840s–80s

Main article: Armenian Question

German ethnographic map of Asia Minor and Caucasus in 1914. Armenians are labeled in blue. The majority of the Armenian population was concentrated in the east of the Ottoman Empire.

In the mid-19th century, the three major European powers, Great Britain, France and Russia, began to question the Empire’s treatment of its Christian minorities and pressure it to grant equal rights to all its subjects. From 1839 to the declaration of a constitution in 1876, the Ottoman government instituted the Tanzimat, a series of reforms designed to improve the status of minorities. Nevertheless, most of the reforms were never implemented because the empire’s Muslim population rejected the principle of equality for Christians. By the late 1870s, the Greeks, along with several other Christian nations in the Balkans, frustrated with their conditions, had, often with the help of the Powers, broken free of Ottoman rule. The Armenians remained, by and large, passive during these years, earning them the title of millet-i sadika or the “loyal millet”.[33]

In the mid-1860s and early 1870s, things began to change as an intellectual class began to emerge among Armenian society. Educated in the European university system or in American missionary schools in the Ottoman Empire, these Armenians began to question their second-class status in society and initiated a movement that asked for better treatment from their government. In one such instance, after amassing the signatures of peasants from Western Armenia, the Armenian Communal Council petitioned the Ottoman government to redress their principal grievances: “the looting and murder in Armenian towns by [Muslim] Kurds andCircassians, improprieties during tax collection, criminal behavior by government officials and the refusal to accept Christians as witnesses in trial”. The Ottoman government considered these grievances and promised to punish those responsible, though no meaningful steps were ever taken.[32]:36

Following the violent suppression of Christians in the uprisings in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria and Serbia in 1875, the Great Powers invoked the 1856 Treaty of Paris by claiming that it gave them the right to intervene and protect the Ottoman Empire’s Christian minorities.[32]:35ff Under growing pressure, the government of Sultan Abdul Hamid II declared itself a constitutional monarchy with a parliament (which was almost immediately prorogued) and entered into negotiations with the powers. At the same time, the Armenian patriarch of Constantinople, Nerses II, forwarded Armenian complaints of widespread “forced land seizure … forced conversion of women and children, arson, protection extortion, rape, and murder” to the Powers.[32]:37

After the Russo-Turkish War of 1877-78, the Armenians increasingly came to see the Russian Empire as the ultimate guarantor of their security. Nerses approached the Russian leadership during its negotiations with the Ottomans in San Stefano and in the eponymous treaty, convinced them to insert a clause, Article 16, stipulating that the Russian forces occupying the Armenian-populated provinces in the eastern Ottoman Empire would withdraw only with the full implementation of reforms.[34] Great Britain was troubled by Russia’s retention of so much Ottoman territory and forced it to enter into new negotiations with the convening of the Congress of Berlin in June 1878. Armenians also entered into these negotiations and emphasized that they sought autonomy, not independence from the Ottoman Empire.[32]:38 They partially succeeded, as Article 61 of the Treaty of Berlin contained the same text as Article 16 but removed any mention that Russian forces would remain in the provinces; instead, the Ottoman government was periodically to inform the Great Powers of the progress of the reforms.

Armenian national liberation movement

As it turned out, the reforms were not forthcoming. Upset with this turn of events, a number of disillusioned Armenian intellectuals living in Europe and Russia decided to form political parties and societies dedicated to the betterment of their compatriots living inside the Ottoman Empire. In the last quarter of the 19th century, this movement came to be dominated by three parties: the Armenakan, whose influence was limited to Van, the Social Democrat Hunchakian Party, and the Armenian Revolutionary Federation (Dashnaktsutiun). Ideological differences aside, all parties were committed to the same goal of improving the social status of Armenians in the Ottoman Empire. Along with their claims for reforms, including the search for European pressure over the Ottoman government for their implementation, the parties also sought to improve the plight of the Armenians through self-defense.[35][36]

Armenian national liberation movement

As it turned out, the reforms were not forthcoming. Upset with this turn of events, a number of disillusioned Armenian intellectuals living in Europe and Russia decided to form political parties and societies dedicated to the betterment of their compatriots living inside the Ottoman Empire. In the last quarter of the 19th century, this movement came to be dominated by three parties: the Armenakan, whose influence was limited to Van, the Social Democrat Hunchakian Party, and the Armenian Revolutionary Federation (Dashnaktsutiun). Ideological differences aside, all parties were committed to the same goal of improving the social status of Armenians in the Ottoman Empire. Along with their claims for reforms, including the search for European pressure over the Ottoman government for their implementation, the parties also sought to improve the plight of the Armenians through self-defense.[35][36]

Hamidian massacres, 1894–96

Main article: Hamidian massacres
Armenian massacres in Erzurum, 1895

Since 1876, the Ottoman state had been led by Sultan Abdul Hamid II. Immediately after the Treaty of Berlin was signed, Abdul Hamid attempted to forestall implementation of its reform provisions by asserting that Armenians did not make up a majority in the provinces and that their reports of abuses were largely exaggerated or false. In 1890, Abdul Hamid created a paramilitary outfit known as the Hamidiye which was made up of Kurdish irregulars who were tasked to “deal with the Armenians as they wished”.[30]:40 As Ottoman officials intentionally provoked rebellions (often as a result of over-taxation) in Armenian populated towns, such as in Sasun in 1894 and Zeitun in 1895–96, these regiments were increasingly used to deal with the Armenians by way of oppression and massacre. In some instances Armenians successfully fought off the regiments and in 1895 brought the excesses to the attention of the Great Powers, who subsequently condemned the Porte.[32]:40–2

In October 1895, the Powers forced Abdul Hamid to sign a new reform package designed to curtail the powers of the Hamidiye but, like the Berlin Treaty, it was never implemented. On 1 October 1895, 2,000 Armenians assembled in Constantinople to petition for the implementation of the reforms, but Ottoman police units converged on the rally and violently broke it up.[30]:57–8 Soon, massacres of Armenians broke out in Constantinople and then engulfed the rest of the Armenian-populated provinces of Bitlis, Diyarbekir, Erzurum, Harput, Sivas, Trabzon, and Van. Estimates differ on how many Armenians were killed but European documentation of the violence, which became known as the Hamidian massacres, placed the figures at between 100,000 and 300,000.[37]

Although Hamid was never directly implicated in ordering the massacres, it is believed that they had his tacit approval.[32]:42 Frustrated with European indifference to the massacres, a group of members of the Armenian Revolutionary Federation seized the European-managed Ottoman Bank on 26 August 1896. This incident brought further sympathy for Armenians in Europe and was lauded by the European and American press, which vilified Hamid and painted him as the “great assassin”, “bloody Sultan”, and “Abdul the Damned“.[30]:35,115 While the Great Powers vowed to take action and enforce new reforms, these never came to fruition due to conflicting political and economic interests.

Prelude to genocide

The Young Turk Revolution of 1908

Main article: Young Turk Revolution
Armenians of Constantinoplecelebrating the establishment of theCUP government.

Armenians of Constantinoplecelebrating the establishment of theCUP government.

Two of the three leaders of the Young Turk triumvirate, Enver Pasha,middle, accompanied by Djemal Pasha,right, in a visit to Jerusalem in 1915, then a part of Ottoman Syria.

On 24 July 1908, Armenians’ hopes for equality in the empire brightened once more when a coup d’état staged by officers in the Ottoman Third Army based in Salonika removed Abdul Hamid II from power and restored the country to a constitutional monarchy. The officers were part of the Young Turk movement that wanted to reform administration of the perceived decadent state of the Ottoman Empire and modernize it to European standards. The movement was an anti-Hamidian coalition made up of two distinct groups: the liberal constitutionalists and the nationalists; the former were more democratic and accepted Armenians into their wing whereas the latter group was more intolerant in regard to Armenian-related issues and their frequent requests for European assistance.[30]:140–1 In 1902, during a congress of the Young Turks held in Paris, the heads of the liberal wing, Sabahaddin and Ahmed Riza Bey, partially persuaded the nationalists to include in their objectives ensuring some rights for all the minorities of the empire.

One of the numerous factions within the Young Turk movement was a secret revolutionary organization called theCommittee of Union and Progress (CUP). It drew its membership from disaffected army officers based in Salonika and was behind a wave of mutinies against the central government. In 1908, elements of the Third Army and the Second Army Corps declared their opposition to the Sultan and threatened to march on the capital to depose him. Hamid, shaken by the wave of resentment, stepped down from power as Armenians, Greeks, Assyrians,Arabs, Bulgarians and Turks alike rejoiced in his dethronement.[30]:143–4

The Adana massacre of 1909

Main article: Adana massacre

 The Armenian quarter of Adana left pillaged and destroyed after the massacres in Adana in 1909.

A countercoup took place in early 1909, ultimately resulting in the 31 March Incident on 13 April 1909. Some reactionary Ottoman military elements, joined byIslamic theological students, aimed to return control of the country to the Sultan and the rule of Islamic law. Riots and fighting broke out between the reactionary forces and CUP forces, until the CUP was able to put down the uprising and court-martial the opposition leaders.

While the movement initially targeted the Young Turk government, it spilled over into pogroms against Armenians who were perceived as having supported the restoration of the constitution.[32]:68–9 When Ottoman Army troops were called in, many accounts record that instead of trying to quell the violence they actually took part in pillaging Armenian enclaves in Adana province.[38] The number of Armenians killed in the course of the Adana massacre ranged between 15,000 and 30,000 people.[32]:69[39]

The Balkan Wars

The Armenian quarter of Adana left pillaged and destroyed after the massacres in Adana in 1909.

In 1912, the First Balkan War broke out and ended with the defeat of the Ottoman Empire as well as the loss of 85% of its European territory. Many in the empire saw their defeat as “Allah’s divine punishment for a society that did not know how to pull itself together”.[32]:84 The Turkish nationalist movement in the country gradually came to view Anatolia as their last refuge. That the Armenian population formed a significant minority in this region would figure prominently in the calculations of the Three Pashas, who would eventually carry out the Armenian Genocide.

An important consequence of the Balkan Wars was also the mass expulsion of Muslims (known as muhacirs) from the Balkans. In fact, beginning in the mid-19th century, hundreds of thousands of Muslims, including Turks, Circassians, and Chechens, were expelled or forced to flee from the Caucasus and the Balkans (Rumelia) as a result of the Russo-Turkish wars and the conflicts in the Balkans. Muslim society in the empire was incensed by this flood of refugees. A journal published in Constantinople expressed the mood of the times: “Let this be a warning … O Muslims, don’t get comfortable! Do not let your blood cool before taking revenge”.[32]:86 As many as 850,000 of these refugees were settled in areas where the Armenians were resident from the period of 1878–1904. The muhacirsresented the status of their relatively well-off neighbors and, as historian Taner Akçam and others have noted, the refugees would come to play a pivotal role in the killings of the Armenians and theconfiscation of their properties during the genocide.[32]:86–87

World War I

On 2 November 1914, the Ottoman Empire opened the Middle Eastern theater of World War I by entering hostilities on the side of the Central Powers and against the Allies. The battles of the Caucasus Campaign, the Persian Campaign and the Gallipoli Campaign affected several populous Armenian centers. Before entering the war, the Ottoman government had sent representatives to the Armenian congress at Erzurum to persuade Ottoman Armenians to facilitate its conquest of Transcaucasia by inciting an insurrection of Russian Armenians against the Russian army in the event a Caucasus frontwas opened. [32]:136[40]

Battle of Sarıkamış

On 24 December 1914, Minister of War Enver Pasha implemented a plan to encircle and destroy the Russian Caucasus Army at Sarıkamış in order to regain territories lost to Russia after the Russo-Turkish War of 1877–78. Enver Pasha’s forces were routed in the battle, and almost completely destroyed. Returning to Constantinople, Enver Pasha publicly blamed his defeat on Armenians in the region having actively sided with the Russians.[30]:200

Labour battalions, 25 February

Further information: Ottoman labour battalions

On 25 February 1915, Enver Pasha sent an order to all military units that Armenians in the active Ottoman forces be demobilized and assigned to the unarmed Labour battalion (Turkish: amele taburlari). Enver Pasha explained this decision as “out of fear that they would collaborate with the Russians”. Traditionally, the Ottoman Army only drafted non-Muslim males between the ages of 20 and 45 into the regular army. The younger (15–20) and older (45–60) non-Muslim soldiers had always been used as logistical support through the labour battalions. Before February, some of the Armenian recruits were utilized as labourers (hamals), though they would ultimately be executed.[41]

Transferring Armenian conscripts from active combat to passive, unarmed logistic sections was an important precursor to the subsequent genocide. As reported in The Memoirs of Naim Bey, the execution of the Armenians in these battalions was part of a premeditated strategy of the Committee of Union and Progress. Many of these Armenian recruits were executed by local Turkish gangs.[30]:178

Events at Van, April 1915

Further information: Siege of Van

Armed Armenian civilians and self-defense units holding a line against Ottoman forces in the walled Siege of Van in May 1915.

On 19 April 1915, Jevdet Bey demanded that the city of Van immediately furnish him 4,000 soldiers under the pretext of conscription. However, it was clear to the Armenian population that his goal was to massacre the able-bodied men of Van so that there would be no defenders. Jevdet Bey had already used his official writ in nearby villages, ostensibly to search for arms, but in fact to initiate wholesale massacres.[30]:202 The Armenians offered five hundred soldiers and exemption money for the rest in order to buy time, but Jevdet Bey accused the Armenians of “rebellion” and asserted his determination to “crush” it at any cost. “If the rebels fire a single shot”, he declared, “I shall kill every Christian man, woman, and” (pointing to his knee) “every child, up to here”.[42]:298

The next day, 20 April 1915, the siege of Van began when an Armenian woman was harassed, and the two Armenian men who came to her aid were killed by Ottoman soldiers. The Armenian defenders protected the 30,000 residents and 15,000 refugees living in an area of roughly one square kilometer of the Armenian Quarter and suburb of Aigestan with 1,500 ablebodied riflemen who were supplied with 300 rifles and 1,000 pistols and antique weapons. The conflict lasted untilGeneral Yudenich of Russia came to their rescue.[43]

Reports of the conflict reached then United States Ambassador to the Ottoman Empire Henry Morgenthau, Sr. from Aleppo and Van, prompting him to raise the issue in person with Talaat and Enver. As he quoted to them the testimonies of his consulate officials, they justified the deportations as necessary to the conduct of the war, suggesting that complicity of the Armenians of Van with the Russian forces that had taken the city justified the persecution of all ethnic Armenians.

Arrest and deportation of Armenian notables, April 1915

Further information: Deportation of Armenian notables in 1915   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deportation_of_Armenian_intellectuals_on_24_April_1915
 

Armenian intellectuals who were arrested and later executed en masseby Young Turk government authorities on the night of 24 April 1915.

By 1914, Ottoman authorities had already begun a propaganda drive to present Armenians living in the Ottoman Empire as a threat to the empire’s security. AnOttoman naval officer in the War Office described the planning:

“In order to justify this enormous crime the requisite propaganda material was thoroughly prepared in Istanbul. [It included such statements as] ‘the Armenians are in league with the enemy. They will launch an uprising in Istanbul, kill off the Ittihadist leaders and will succeed in opening up the straits [of the Dardanelles]'”.[33]:220

Armenian intellectuals who were arrested and later executed en masseby Young Turk government authorities on the night of 24 April 1915.

Interior Minister Talaat Pasha, who ordered the arrests.

On the night of 23–24 April 1915, Red Sunday (Armenian: Կարմիր Կիրակի Garmir Giragi), the Ottoman government rounded up and imprisoned an estimated 250 Armenian intellectuals and community leaders of the Ottoman capital,Constantinople, and later those in other centers, who were moved to two holding centers near Ankara.[30]:211–2 This date coincided with Allied troop landings at Gallipoli after unsuccessful Allied naval attempts to break through the Dardanellesto Constantinople in February and March 1915.

Following the passage of Tehcir Law on 29 May 1915, the Armenian leaders, except for the few who were able to return to Constantinople, were gradually deported and assassinated. The date April 24 is commemorated as Genocide Remembrance Day by Armenians around the world

In May 1915, Mehmet Talaat Pasha requested that the cabinet and Grand Vizier Said Halim Pasha legalize a measure for the deportation of Armenians to other places due to what Talaat Pasha called “the Armenian riots and massacres, which had arisen in a number of places in the country”. However, Talaat Pasha was referring specifically to events in Van and extending the implementation to the regions in which alleged “riots and massacres” would affect the security of the war zone of the Caucasus Campaign. Later, the scope of the deportation was widened in order to include the Armenians in the other provinces.

Deportations

Map of massacre locations and deportation and extermination centers
 In May 1915, Mehmet Talaat Pasha requested that the cabinet and Grand Vizier Said Halim Pasha legalize a measure for the deportation of Armenians to other places due to what Talaat Pasha called “the Armenian riots and massacres, which had arisen in a number of places in the country”. However, Talaat Pasha was referring specifically to events in Van and extending the implementation to the regions in which alleged “riots and massacres” would affect the security of the war zone of the Caucasus Campaign. Later, the scope of the deportation was widened in order to include the Armenians in the other provinces.

The remains of Armenians massacred at Erzinjan.[44]

On 29 May 1915, the CUP Central Committee passed the Temporary Law of Deportation (“Tehcir Law”), giving the Ottoman government and military authorization to deport anyone it “sensed” as a threat to national security.[30]:186–8

An article by the New York Timesdated 15 December 1915 states that one million Armenians had been either deported or executed by the Ottoman government.

With the implementation of Tehcir Law, the confiscation of Armenian property and the slaughter of Armenians that ensued upon its enactment outraged much of the western world. While the Ottoman Empire’s wartime allies offered little protest, a wealth of German and Austrian historical documents has since come to attest to the witnesses’ horror at the killings and mass starvation of Armenians.[45]:329–31[46]:212–3 In the United States, The New York Times reported almost daily on the mass murder of the Armenian people, describing the process as “systematic”, “authorized” and “organized by the government”. Theodore Roosevelt would later characterize this as “the greatest crime of the war”.[47]

Historian Hans-Lukas Kieser states that, from the statements of Talaat Pasha[48] it is clear that the officials were aware that the deportation order was genocidal.[49] Another historian Taner Akçam states that the telegrams show that the overall coordination of the genocide was taken over by Talaat Pasha.[50]

Death marches

The Armenians were marched out to the Syrian town of Deir ez-Zor and the surrounding desert. There is no evidence that the Ottoman government provided the extensive facilities and supplies that would have been necessary to sustain the life of hundreds of thousands of Armenian deportees during their forced march to the Syrian desert or after.[51] By August 1915, The New York Times repeated an unattributed report that “the roads and the Euphrates are strewn with corpses of exiles, and those who survive are doomed to certain death. It is a plan to exterminate the whole Armenian people”.[52]Talaat Pasha and Djemal Pasha were completely aware that by abandoning the Armenian deportees in the desert they were condemning them to certain death.[53] A dispatch from a “high diplomatic source in Turkey, not American, reporting the testimony of trustworthy witnesses” about the plight of Armenian deportees in northern Arabia and the Lower Euphrates valley was extensively quoted by The New York Times in August 1916:

“The witnesses have seen thousands of deported Armenians under tents in the open, in caravans on the march, descending the river in boats and in all phases of their miserable life. Only in a few places does the Government issue any rations, and those are quite insufficient. The people, therefore, themselves are forced to satisfy their hunger with food begged in that scanty land or found in the parched fields.

Naturally, the death rate from starvation and sickness is very high and is increased by the brutal treatment of the authorities, whose bearing toward the exiles as they are being driven back and forth over the desert is not unlike that of slave drivers. With few exceptions no shelter of any kind is provided and the people coming from a cold climate are left under the scorching desert sun without food and water. Temporary relief can only be obtained by the few able to pay officials.”[51]

Similarly, Major General Friedrich Freiherr Kress von Kressenstein noted that “The Turkish policy of causing starvation is an all too obvious proof, if proof was still needed as to who is responsible for the massacre, for the Turkish resolve to destroy the Armenians”.[33]:350

German engineers and labourers involved in building the railway also witnessed Armenians being crammed into cattle cars and shipped along the railroad line. Franz Gunther, a representative forDeutsche Bank which was funding the construction of the Baghdad Railway, forwarded photographs to his directors and expressed his frustration at having to remain silent amid such “bestial cruelty”.[30]:326 Major General Otto von Lossow, acting military attaché and head of the German Military Plenipotentiary in the Ottoman Empire, spoke to Ottoman intentions in a conference held inBatum in 1918:

The Turks have embarked upon the “total extermination of the Armenians in Transcaucasia … The aim of Turkish policy is, as I have reiterated, the taking of possession of Armenian districts and the extermination of the Armenians. Talaat’s government wants to destroy all Armenians, not just in Turkey but also outside Turkey. On the basis of all the reports and news coming to me here in Tiflis there hardly can be any doubt that the Turks systematically are aiming at the extermination of the few hundred thousand Armenians whom they left alive until now.[33]:349

Extermination camps

The original caption of photograph reads: “The Above Photograph Shows Eight Armenian Professors Massacred by the Turks”[54]

A network of 25 concentration camps was set up by the Ottoman government to dispose of the Armenians who had survived the deportations to their ultimate point.[55] This network, situated in the region of Turkey’s present-day borders with Iraq and Syria, was directed by Şükrü Kaya, one of Talaat Pasha’s right-hand men. Some of the camps were only temporary transit points. Others, such as Radjo, Katma, and Azaz, were briefly used for mass graves and then vacated by autumn 1915. Camps such as Lale, Tefridje, Dipsi, Del-El, and Ra’s al-‘Ayn were built specifically for those whose life expectancy was just a few days[56]

Confiscation of property

The Tehcir Law brought some measures regarding the property of the deportees, but during September a new law was proposed. By means of the “Abandoned Properties” Law (Law Concerning Property, Dept’s and Assets Left Behind Deported Persons, also referred as the “Temporary Law on Expropriation and Confiscation”), the Ottoman government took possession of all “abandoned” Armenian goods and properties. Ottoman parliamentary representative Ahmed Rizaprotested this legislation:

It is unlawful to designate the Armenian assets as “abandoned goods” for the Armenians, the proprietors, did not abandon their properties voluntarily; they were forcibly, compulsorily removed from their domiciles and exiled. Now the government through its efforts is selling their goods … If we are a constitutional regime functioning in accordance with constitutional law we can’t do this. This is atrocious. Grab my arm, eject me from my village, then sell my goods and properties, such a thing can never be permissible. Neither the conscience of the Ottomans nor the law can allow it.[57]

On 13 September 1915, the Ottoman parliament passed the “Temporary Law of Expropriation and Confiscation”, stating that all property, including land, livestock, and homes belonging to Armenians, was to be confiscated by the authorities.[33]:224

Relief

Fundraising poster for the American Committee for Relief in the Near East – the United States contributed a significant amount of aid to help Armenians during the Armenian Genocide.

The American Committee for Relief in the Near East (ACRNE, or “Near East Relief”), established in 1915 just after the deportations began, was a charitable organization established to relieve the suffering of the peoples of the Near East.[58] The organization was championed by Henry Morgenthau, Sr., American ambassador to the Ottoman Empire. Morgenthau’s dispatches on the mass slaughter of Armenians galvanized much support for the organization.[59] In its first year, the ACRNE cared for 132,000 Armenian orphans from Tiflis, Yerevan, Constantinople, Sivas, Beirut, Damascus, and Jerusalem. A relief organization for refugees in the Middle East helped donate over $102 million (budget $117,000,000) [1930 value of dollar] to Armenians both during and after the war.[60][61]:336Between 1915 and 1930, ACRNE distributed humanitarian relief to locations across a wide geographical range, eventually spending over ten times its original estimate and helping around 2,000,000 refugees.[62]

Teshkilat-i Mahsusa

Main article: Teşkilat-i Mahsusa

The Committee of Union and Progress founded a “special organization” (Turkish: Teşkilat-i Mahsusa) that participated in the destruction of the Ottoman Armenian community.[63] This organization adopted its name in 1913 and functioned like a special forces outfit, and it has been compared by some scholars to the NaziEinsatzgruppen.[30]:182, 185 Later in 1914, the Ottoman government influenced the direction the special organization was to take by releasing criminals from central prisons to be the central elements of this newly formed special organization.[64] According to the Mazhar commissions attached to the tribunal as soon as November 1914, 124 criminals were released from Pimian prison. Little by little from the end of 1914 to the beginning of 1915, hundreds, then thousands of prisoners were freed to form the members of this organization. Later, they were charged to escort the convoys of Armenian deportees.[65] Vehib Pasha, commander of the Ottoman Third Army, called those members of the special organization, the “butchers of the human species”.[66]

 

Fundraising poster for the American Committee for Relief in the Near East – the United States contributed a significant amount of aid to help Armenians during the Armenian Genocide.

Massacres

Mass burnings

Of this photo, the United States ambassador wrote, “Scenes like this were common all over the Armenian provinces, in the spring and summer months of 1915. Death in its several forms—massacre, starvation, exhaustion—destroyed the larger part of the refugees. The Turkish policy was that of extermination under the guise of deportation”.[42]

Of this photo, the United States ambassador wrote, “Scenes like this were common all over the Armenian provinces, in the spring and summer months of 1915. Death in its several forms—massacre, starvation, exhaustion—destroyed the larger part of the refugees. The Turkish policy was that of extermination under the guise of deportation”.[42]

Eitan Belkind was a Nili member who infiltrated the Ottoman army as an official. He was assigned to the headquarters of Kamal Pasha. He claims to have witnessed the burning of 5,000 Armenians.[67]:181,183

Lt. Hasan Maruf of the Ottoman army describes how a population of a village were taken all together and then burned.[68] The Commander of the Third Army Vehib’s 12-page affidavit, which was dated 5 December 1918, was presented in the Trabzon trial series (29 March 1919) included in the Key Indictment,[69]reporting such a mass burning of the population of an entire village near Muş: “The shortest method for disposing of the women and children concentrated in the various camps was to burn them”.[70] Further, it was reported that “Turkish prisoners who had apparently witnessed some of these scenes were horrified and maddened at remembering the sight. They told the Russians that the stench of the burning human flesh permeated the air for many days after”.[71]

Drowning

Trabzon was the main city in Trabzon province; Oscar S. Heizer, the American consul at Trabzon, reported: “This plan did not suit Nail Bey … Many of the children were loaded into boats and taken out to sea and thrown overboard”.[72] The Italian consul of Trabzon in 1915, Giacomo Gorrini, writes: “I saw thousands of innocent women and children placed on boats which were capsized in the Black Sea”.[73] The Trabzon trials reported Armenians having been drowned in the Black Sea.[74]

Hoffman Philip, the American chargé d’affaires at Constantinople, wrote: “Boat loads sent from Zor down the river arrived at Ana, one thirty miles away, with three fifths of passengers missing”.[75]

Use of poison and drug overdoses

The psychiatrist Robert Jay Lifton writes in a parenthesis when introducing the medical experiments during the Holocaust, “Perhaps Turkish doctors, in their participation in the genocide against the Armenians, come closest, as I shall later suggest”.[76]

Morphine overdose: During the Trabzon trial series of the Martial court, from the sittings between 26 March and 17 May 1919, the Trabzons Health Services Inspector Dr. Ziya Fuad wrote in a report that Dr. Saib caused the death of children with the injection of morphine. The information was allegedly provided by two physicians (Drs. Ragib and Vehib), both Dr. Saib’s colleagues at Trabzons Red Crescent hospital, where those atrocities were said to have been committed.[77][78]

Toxic gas: Dr. Ziya Fuad and Dr. Adnan, public health services director of Trabzon, submitted affidavits reporting cases in which two school buildings were used to organize children and send them to the mezzanine to kill them with toxic gas equipment.[79]

Typhoid inoculation: The Ottoman surgeon, Dr. Haydar Cemal wrote “on the order of the Chief Sanitation Office of the Third Army in January 1916, when the spread of typhus was an acute problem, innocent Armenians slated for deportation at Erzincan were inoculated with the blood of typhoid fever patients without rendering that blood ‘inactive'”.[79] Jeremy Hugh Baron writes: “Individual doctors were directly involved in the massacres, having poisoned infants, killed children and issued false certificates of death from natural causes. Nazim‘s brother-in-law Dr. Tevfik Rushdu, Inspector-General of Health Services, organized the disposal of Armenian corpses with thousands of kilos of lime over six months; he became foreign secretary from 1925 to 1938″.[80]

Trials

Turkish courts-martial

In 1919, Sultan Mehmed VI ordered domestic courts-martial to try members of the Committee of Union and Progress (CUP) (Turkish: “Ittihat Terakki“) for their role in taking the Ottoman Empire into World War I. The courts-martial blamed the members of CUP for pursuing a war that did not fit into the notion of Millet. The Armenian issue was used as a tool to punish the leaders of the CUP. Most of the documents generated in these courts were later moved to international trials. By January 1919, a report to Sultan Mehmed VI accused over 130 suspects, most of whom were high officials. The military court found that it was the will of the CUP to eliminate the Armenians physically, via its Special Organization. The 1919 pronouncement reads as follows:

The Court Martial taking into consideration the above-named crimes declares, unanimously, the culpability as principal factors of these crimes the fugitives Talaat Pasha, former Grand Vizir, Enver Efendi, former War Minister, struck off the register of the Imperial Army, Cemal Efendi, former Navy Minister, struck off too from the Imperial Army, and Dr. Nazim Efendi, former Minister of Education, members of the General Council of the Union & Progress, representing the moral person of that party; … the Court Martial pronounces, in accordance with said stipulations of the Law the death penalty against Talaat, Enver, Cemal, and Dr. Nazim.

The term Three Pashas, which include Mehmed Talaat Pasha and Ismail Enver, refers to the triumvirate who had fled the Empire at the end of World War I. At the trials in Constantinople in 1919 they were sentenced to death in absentia. The courts-martial officially disbanded the CUP and confiscated its assets, and the assets of those found guilty. At least two of the three were later assassinated byArmenian vigilantes.

International trials

Main articles: Malta exiles and Malta Tribunals

Following the Mudros Armistice, the preliminary Peace Conference in Paris established “The Commission on Responsibilities and Sanctions” in January 1919, which was chaired by US Secretary of State Lansing. Based on the commission’s work, several articles were added to the Treaty of Sèvres, and the acting government of the Ottoman Empire, Sultan Mehmed VI and Damat Adil Ferit Pasha, were summoned to trial. The Treaty of Sèvres (August 1920) planned a trial to determine those responsible for the “barbarous and illegitimate methods of warfare … [including] offenses against the laws and customs of war and the principles of humanity”.[21] Article 230 of the Treaty of Sèvres required the Ottoman Empire “hand over to the Allied Powers the persons whose surrender may be required by the latter as being responsible for the massacres committed during the continuance of the state of war on territory which formed part of the Ottoman Empire on August 1, 1914″.

Various Ottoman politicians, generals, and intellectuals were transferred to Malta, where they were held for some three years while searches were made of archives in Constantinople, London, Paris and Washington to investigate their actions.[81] However, the Inter-allied tribunal attempt demanded by the Treaty of Sèvres never solidified and the detainees were eventually returned to Turkey in exchange for British citizens held by Kemalist Turkey.

Trial of Soghomon Tehlirian

On 15 March 1921, former Grand Vizier Talaat Pasha was assassinated in the Charlottenburg District of Berlin, Germany, in broad daylight and in the presence of many witnesses. Talaat’s death was part of “Operation Nemesis“, the Armenian Revolutionary Federation‘s codename for their covert operation in the 1920s to kill the planners of the Armenian Genocide.

The subsequent trial of the assassin, Soghomon Tehlirian, had an important influence on Raphael Lemkin, a lawyer of PolishJewish descent who campaigned in the League of Nations to ban what he called “barbarity” and “vandalism”. The term “genocide“, created in 1943, was coined by Lemkin who was directly influenced by the massacres of Armenians during World War I.[82]:210

Armenian population, deaths, survivors, 1914 to 1918

While there is no consensus as to how many Armenians lost their lives during the Armenian Genocide, there is general agreement among western scholars that over 500,000 Armenians died between 1914 and 1918. Estimates vary between 600,000,[83] to 1,500,000 (per Western scholars,[84] Argentina,[85] and other states). Encyclopædia Britannica references the research of Arnold J. Toynbee, an intelligence officer of the British Foreign Office, who estimated that by 1916, 600,000 Armenians “died or were massacred during deportation”.[71][86] This figure, however, accounts for solely the first year of the Genocide and does not take into account those who died or were killed after 1916.[87]

According to some newly discovered documents that once belonged to Talaat Pasha, more than 970,000 Ottoman Armenians disappeared from official population records from 1915 through 1916. Talaat’s widow, Hayriye Talaat Bafralı, gave the documents and records in 1983 to Turkish journalist Murat Bardakçı, who has published them in a book titled The Remaining Documents of Talat Pasha(aka “Talat Pasha’s Black Book”). According to the documents, the number of Armenians living in the Ottoman Empire before 1915 stood at 1,256,000. The number plunged to 284,157 two years later in 1917.[88]

Justin McCarthy calculated an estimate of the pre-war Armenian population, then subtracted his estimate of survivors, arriving at a figure of a little less than 600,000 for Armenian casualties for the period 1914 to 1922.[89] In a more recent essay, he projected that if the Armenian records of 1913 were accurate, 250,000 more deaths should be added, for a total of 850,000.[90]

However, McCarthy’s numbers have been highly contested by many specialists. Some of them, like Frédéric Paulin, have severely criticized McCarthy’s methodology and suggested that it is flawed.[91]Hilmar Kaiser[92] another specialist has made similar claims, as have professor Vahakn N. Dadrian[93] and professor Levon Marashlian.[94] The critics not only question McCarthy’s methodology and resulting calculations, but also his primary sources, the Ottoman censuses. They point out that there was no official statistic census in 1912; rather those numbers were based on the records of 1905 which were conducted during the reign of Sultan Hamid.[95] While Ottoman censuses claimed an Armenian population of 1.2 million, Fa’iz El-Ghusein (the Kaimakam of Kharpout) wrote that there were about 1.9 million Armenians in the Ottoman Empire,[96] and some modern scholars estimate over 2 million. German official Max Erwin von Scheubner-Richter wrote that fewer than 100,000 Armenians survived the genocide, the rest having been exterminated (German: ausgerottet).[97]:329–30

Mass killings continued under the Republic of Turkey during the Turkish–Armenian War phase of Turkish War of Independence.[98] 60,000 to 98,000 Armenian civilians were estimated to have been killed by the Turkish army.[99] Some estimates put the total number of Armenians massacred in the hundreds of thousands.[100][101]

Contemporaneous reports and reactions

Workers of the American Committee for Relief in the Near East in Sivas.

Hundreds of eyewitnesses, including the neutral United States and the Ottoman Empire’s own allies, Germany and Austria-Hungary, recorded and documented numerous acts of state-sponsored massacres. Many foreign officials offered to intervene on behalf of the Armenians, including Pope Benedict XV, only to be turned away by Ottoman government officials who claimed they were retaliating against a pro-Russian insurrection.[18]:177 On 24 May 1915, the Triple Ententewarned the Ottoman Empire that “In view of these new crimes of Turkey against humanity and civilization, the Allied Governments announce publicly to the Sublime Porte that they will hold personally responsible for these crimes all members of the Ottoman Government, as well as those of their agents who are implicated in such massacres”.[102]

The U.S. Mission in the Ottoman Empire

A telegram sent by AmbassadorHenry Morgenthau, Sr. to the State Department on 16 July 1915 describes the massacres as a “campaign of race extermination”.

The United States had consulates throughout the Ottoman Empire, including locations in Edirne, Elâzığ, Samsun, İzmir,Trebizond, Van, Constantinople, and Aleppo. It was officially a neutral party until it joined the Allies in 1917. In addition to the consulates, there were numerous American Protestant missionary compounds established in Armenian-populated regions, including Van and Kharput. The atrocities were reported regularly in newspapers and literary journals around the world.[30]:282–5

On his return home in 1924 after thirty years as a U.S. Consul in the Near East, and most of the preceding decade as Consul General at Smyrna, George Hortonwrote his own “account of the Systematic Extermination of Christian Populations by Mohammedans and of the Culpability of Certain Great Powers; with a True Story of the Burning of Smyrna” (1926 subtitle, The Blight of Asia).[103] Horton’s account quoted numerous contemporary communications and eyewitness reports including one of the massacre of Phocea in 1914, by a Frenchman, and two of the Armenian massacres of 1914/15, by an American citizen and a German missionary.[103]:28–9,34–7. It also quoted U.S. businessman Walter M. Geddes regarding his time in Damascus: “several Turks[,] whom I interviewed, told me that the motive of this exile was to exterminate the race.”[104]

Many Americans spoke out against the genocide, including former president Theodore Roosevelt, rabbi Stephen Wise, Alice Stone Blackwell, and William Jennings Bryan, the U.S. Secretary of State to June 1915. In the U.S. and the United Kingdom, children were regularly reminded to clean their plates while eating and to “remember the starving Armenians”.[105]

Ambassador Morgenthau’s Story

Audio recording of Chapter 24, “The Murder of a Nation”, from Ambassador Morgenthau’s Story.

As the orders for deportations and massacres were enacted, many consular officials reported what they were witnessing to the ambassador. In memoirs that he completed during 1918 Morgenthau wrote, “When the Turkish authorities gave the orders for these deportations, they were merely giving the death warrant to a whole race; they understood this well, and, in their conversations with me, they made no particular attempt to conceal the fact …”[42]:309 The memoirs and reports vividly described the methods used by Ottoman forces and documented numerous instances of atrocities committed against the Christian minority.[106]

Allied forces in the Middle East

On the Middle Eastern front, the British military was engaged fighting the Ottoman forces in southern Syria and Mesopotamia. British diplomat Gertrude Bell filed the following report after hearing the account from a captured Ottoman soldier:

The battalion left Aleppo on 3 February and reached Ras al-Ain in twelve hours … some 12,000 Armenians were concentrated under the guardianship of some hundred Kurds … These Kurds were called gendarmes, but in reality mere butchers; bands of them were publicly ordered to take parties of Armenians, of both sexes, to various destinations, but had secret instructions to destroy the males, children and old women … One of these gendarmes confessed to killing 100 Armenian men himself … the empty desert cisterns and caves were also filled with corpses …[45]:327

Winston Churchill described the massacres as an “administrative holocaust” and noted that “the clearance of the race from Asia Minor was about as complete as such an act, on a scale so great, could well be. … There is no reasonable doubt that this crime was planned and executed for political reasons. The opportunity presented itself for clearing Turkish soil of a Christian race opposed to all Turkish ambitions, cherishing national ambitions that could only be satisfied at the expense of Turkey, and planted geographically between Turkish and Caucasian Moslems”.[45]:329

Arnold Toynbee: The Treatment of Armenians

Historian Arnold J. Toynbee published the collection of documents The Treatment of Armenians in the Ottoman Empire in 1916. Together with British politician and historian Viscount James Bryce, he compiled statements from survivors and eyewitnesses from other countries including Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Sweden, and Switzerland, who similarly attested to the systematic massacre of innocent Armenians by Ottoman government forces.[107]

The book has since been criticized as British wartime propaganda to build up sentiment against the Central Powers[citation needed], but Bryce had submitted the work to scholars for verification before its publication. University of Oxford Regius Professor Gilbert Murray stated, “… the evidence of these letters and reports will bear any scrutiny and overpower any skepticism. Their genuineness is established beyond question”.[33]:228 Other professors, including Herbert Fisher of Sheffield University and former American Bar Association president Moorfield Storey, came to the same conclusion.[33]:228–9

Joint Austrian and German mission

As allies during the war, the Imperial German mission in the Ottoman Empire included both military and civilian components. Germany had brokered a deal with the Sublime Porte to commission the building of a railroad called the Baghdad Railway that would stretch from Berlin to the Middle East. At the beginning of 1915, Germany’s diplomatic mission was led by Ambassador Hans Freiherr von Wangenheim who, upon his death in 1915, was succeeded by Count Paul Wolff Metternich. Like Morgenthau, von Wangenheim began receiving many disturbing messages from consular officials around the Ottoman Empire that detailed the massacres of Armenians. From the province of Adana, Consul Eugene Buge reported that the CUP chief had sworn to massacre any Armenians who had survived the deportation marches.[30]:186 In June 1915, von Wangenheim sent a cable to Berlin reporting that Talaat had admitted that the deportations were not “being carried out because of ‘military considerations alone'”. One month later, he came to the conclusion that there “no longer was doubt that the Porte was trying to exterminate the Armenian race in the Turkish Empire”.[46]:213

When Wolff-Metternich succeeded von Wangenheim, he continued to dispatch similar cables: “The Committee [CUP] demands the extirpation of the last remnants of the Armenians and the government must yield … A Committee representative is assigned to each of the provincial administrations … Turkification means license to expel, to kill or destroy everything that is not Turkish”.[108]

Another notable figure in the German military camp was Max Erwin von Scheubner-Richter, who documented various massacres of Armenians. He sent fifteen reports regarding “deportations and mass killings” to the German chancellery. His final report noted that fewer than 100,000 Armenians were left alive in the Ottoman Empire: the rest having been exterminated (German: ausgerottet).[45]:329–30Scheubner-Richter also detailed the methods of the Ottoman government, noting its use of the Special Organization and other bureaucratized instruments of genocide.

The Germans also witnessed the way Armenians were burned according to Israeli historian, Bat Ye’or, who writes: “The Germans, allies of the Turks in the First World War … saw how civil populations were shut up in churches and burned, or gathered en masse in camps, tortured to death, and reduced to ashes”.[109] German officers stationed in eastern Turkey disputed the government’s assertion that Armenian revolts had broken out, suggesting that the areas were “quiet until the deportations began”.[46]:212 Other Germans openly supported the Ottoman policy against the Armenians. As Hans Humann, the German naval attaché in Constantinople said to US Ambassador Henry Morgenthau:

Children taken in by Near East Relief

I have lived in Turkey the larger part of my life … and I know the Armenians. I also know that both Armenians and Turks cannot live together in this country. One of these races has got to go. And I don’t blame the Turks for what they are doing to the Armenians. I think that they are entirely justified. The weaker nation must succumb. The Armenians desire to dismember Turkey; they are against the Turks and the Germans in this war, and they therefore have no right to exist here.[42]:375

In a genocide conference held in 2001, professor Wolfgang Wipperman of the Free University of Berlin introduced documents evidencing that the German High Command was aware of the mass killings at the time but chose not to interfere or speak out.[45]:331 In his reports to Berlin in 1917, General Hans von Seecktsupported the reforming efforts of the Young Turks, writing that “the inner weakness of Turkey in their entirety, call for the history and custom of the new Turkish empire to be written”.[110] Seeckt added that “Only a few moments of the destruction are still mentioned. The upper levels of society had become unwarlike, the main reason being the increasing mixing with foreign elements of a long standing unculture”.[110] Seeckt blamed all of the problems of the Ottoman Empire on the Jews and the Armenians, whom he portrayed as a fifth column working for the Allies.[110] In July 1918, Seeckt sent a message to Berlin stating that “It is an impossible state of affairs to be allied with the Turks and to stand up for the Armenians. In my view any consideration, Christian, sentimental, and political should be eclipsed by a hard, but clear necessity for war”.[110]

Photographs exist that may also suggest the Germans participated in the mass killing and some of the German witnesses to the Armenian holocaust would go on to play a role in the Nazi regime.Konstantin Freiherr von Neurath, for example, who was attached to the Turkish 4th Army in 1915 with instructions to monitor “operations” against the Armenians, later became Hitler’s foreign minister and “Protector of Bohemia and Moravia” during Reinhard Heydrich’s terror in Czechoslovakia.[111]

Armin T. Wegner

See also: Armin T. Wegner

German aspiring writer Armin T. Wegner enrolled as a medic during the winter of 1914–15. He defied censorship by taking hundreds of photographs[112] of Armenians being deported and subsequently starving in northern Syrian camps[45]:326 and in the deserts of Deir-er-Zor. Wegner was part of a German detachment under field marshal von der Goltz stationed near the Baghdad Railway in Mesopotamia. He was eventually arrested by the Germans and recalled to Germany.

Wegner protested against the atrocities in an open letter submitted to U.S. President Woodrow Wilson at the peace conference of 1919. The letter made a case for the creation of an independent Armenian state. Also in 1919, he published The Road of No Return (“Der Weg ohne Heimkehr”), a collection of letters he had written during what he deemed the “martyrdom” (German: “Martyrium”) of the Armenians.[113] A documentary film depicting Wegner’s personal account of the Armenian Genocide through his own photographs, called “Destination Nowhere: The Witness” and produced by Dr J. Michael Hagopian, premiered in Fresno on 25 April 2000.[114] Prior to the release of the documentary, he was honored at the Armenian Genocide Museum in Yerevan for championing the plight of Armenians throughout his life.

Russian military

The Russian Empire’s response to the bombardment of its Black Sea naval ports was primarily a land campaign through the Caucasus. Early victories against the Ottoman Empire from the winter of 1914 to the spring 1915 saw significant gains of territory, including relieving the Armenian bastion resisting in the city of Van in May 1915. The Russians also reported encountering the bodies of unarmed civilian Armenians as they advanced.[115] In March 1916, the scenes they saw in the city of Erzurum led the Russians to retaliate against the Ottoman III Army whom they held responsible for the massacres, destroying it in its entirety.[116]

Swedish Embassy and Military Attaché

Sweden, as a neutral state during the entire World War I, had permanent representatives in the Ottoman Empire, able to continuously report on the ongoing events in the country. The Swedish Embassy in Constantinople, represented by Ambassador Per Gustaf August Cosswa Anckarsvärd, along with Envoy M. Ahlgren, and the Swedish Military Attaché, Captain Einar af Wirsén, closely followed the development throughout the empire, reporting, among others, on the Armenian massacres. On 7 July 1915, Anckarsvärd dispatched a two-page report to Stockholm, beginning with the following information:

The persecutions of the Armenians have reached hair-raising proportions and all points to the fact that the Young Turks want to seize the opportunity, since due to different reasons there are no effective external pressure to be feared, to once and for all put an end to the Armenian question. The means for this are quite simple and consist of the extermination (utrotandet) of the Armenian nation.[117]:39

During the remainder of 1915 alone, Anckarsvärd dispatched six other reports entitled “The Persecutions of the Armenians”. In his report on 22 July, Anckarsvärd noted that the persecutions of the Armenians were being extended to encompass all Christians in the Ottoman Empire:

[The deportations] can not be any other issue than an annihilation war against the Greek nation in Turkey and as measures hereof they have been implementing forced conversions to Islam, in obvious aim to, that if after the end of the war there again would be a question of European intervention for the protection of the Christians, there will be as few of them left as possible.[117]:40

On 9 August 1915, Anckarsvärd dispatched yet another report, confirming his suspicions regarding the plans of the Turkish government, “It is obvious that the Turks are taking the opportunity to, now during the war, annihilate [utplåna] the Armenian nation so that when the peace comes no Armenian question longer exists”.[117]:41

When reflecting upon the situation in Turkey during the final stages of the war, Envoy Alhgren presented an analysis of the prevailing situation in Turkey and the hard times which had befallen the population. In explaining the increased living costs he identified a number of reasons: “obstacles for domestic trade, the almost total paralysing of the foreign trade and finally the strong decreasing of labour power, caused partly by the mobilisation but partly also by the extermination of the Armenian race [utrotandet af den armeniska rasen]”.[117]:52

Wirsén, when writing his memoirs from his mission to the Balkans and Turkey, Minnen från fred och krig (“Memories from Peace and War”), dedicated an entire chapter to the Armenian genocide, entitledMordet på en nation (“The Murder of a Nation”). Commenting on the interpretation that the deportations resulted from the purported collaboration of the Armenians with the Russians, Wirsen concludes that their subsequent deportations were nothing but a cover for their extermination.: “Officially, these had the goal to move the entire Armenian population to the steppe regions of Northern Mesopotamia and Syria, but in reality they aimed to exterminate [utrota] the Armenians, whereby the pure Turkish element in Asia Minor would achieve a dominating position”.[117]:28

In conclusion, Wirsén made the following note: “The annihilation of the Armenian nation in Asia Minor must revolt all human feelings … The way the Armenian problem was solved was hair-raising. I can still see in front of me Talaat’s cynical expression, when he emphasized that the Armenian question was solved”.[117]:29

Bodil Biørn

In 1905 the missionary nurse Bodil Biørn (1871–1960) was sent to Armenia. First based in the town of Mezereh (now Elazig) and later in Mush, she worked for widows and orphaned children in cooperation with missionaries from the German Hülfsbund. She witnessed the massacres of 1915 in Mush and saw most of the children in her care murdered along with Armenian priests, teachers, and assistants. She barely escaped after 9 days on horseback but stayed on in the region for another 2 years under increasingly difficult working conditions. After a period at home she again went to Armenia and, until she retired in 1935, worked for Armenian refugees in Syria and Lebanon. Bodil Biørn was also an able photographer. Many of her photos are now in the WMF archive, which since the organisation was dissolved in 1982 has been preserved in the National Archives of Norway. In combination with her comments, written in her photo albums or on the back of the prints themselves, these photos bear strong witness of the atrocities that she saw.[118]

Ottoman Empire and Turkey

Mehmet Celal Bey

According to Mehmet Celal Bey, the former governor of the Province of Aleppo, the governor of the Province of Konya at the time explained the situation to him and said: “Blood flowed instead of water in the river, and thousands of innocent children, blameless elderly, helpless women and strong youths were flowing towards death in this blood flow.”[119]

In 1919, Ahmet Refik (Altınay) wrote: “The Unionists (Committee of Union and Progress) wanted to remove the problem of Vilâyât-ı Sitte with annihilating Armenians.”[120]

At a secret session of the National Assembly, held on 17 October 1920, Hasan Fehmi (Ataç), deputy of Gümüşhane, said: “As you know, the issue of relocation was an event that made the world to yell blue and made all of us to be considered murderers. We knew, before we did it, that the Christian world would not tolerate it and they would direct their anger and hatred toward us. Why did we impute the title of murderer to our race? Why did we enter into such decisive and difficult struggle? That was done just to secure the future of our country, which we know to be more precious and sacred than our lives.”[121]

Persia

Due to the period of weak central government and Tehran’s inability to protect its territorial integrity, no resistance was offered by the mostly Islamic Persian troops when, after the withdrawal of Russian troops from the extreme northwest of Persia, Islamic Turks invaded the town of Salmas in northwestern Persia and tortured and massacred the Christian Armenian inhabitants.[122]

Mohammad-Ali Jamalzadeh, a prominent Persian writer in the 20th century, studied in Europe where he joined a group of Iranian nationalists in Berlin who were to eventually start a newspaper (Rastakhiz) in Baghdad in 1915. After remaining in Baghdad, Jamalzadeh went to Constantinople where he witnessed the deportations of Armenians and encountered many corpses during his journey.[123] He wrote of his experiences and eyewitness accounts decades later in two books entitled “Qatl-e Amm-e Armanian” (Armenian massacres) and “Qatl o ḡārat-e Arāmaneh dar Torkiya” (On the massacres of Armenians in Ottoman Turkey) which were published in 1972 and 1963 respectively.[123]

Study of the Armenian Genocide

The Armenian Genocide is widely corroborated by international genocide scholars. The International Association of Genocide Scholars (IAGS), consisting of the world’s foremost experts on genocide,[124]unanimously passed a formal resolution affirming the fact of the Armenian Genocide. According to IAGS, “Every book on comparative genocide studies in the English language contains a segment on the Armenian Genocide. Leading texts in the international law of genocide such as William Schabas‘s ‘Genocide in International Law’ cite the Armenian Genocide as precursor to the Holocaust and as a precedent for the law on crimes against humanity. Polish jurist Raphael Lemkin, when he coined the term genocide in 1944, cited the Turkish extermination of the Armenians and the Nazi extermination of the Jews as defining examples of what he meant by genocide. The killings of Armenians is genocide as defined by the 1948 United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. 126 leading scholars of the holocaust including Elie Wiesel, and Yehuda Bauer placed a statement in the New York Times in June 2000 declaring the “inconstestable fact of the Armenian genocide” and urging western democracies to acknowledge it. “The Institute on the Holocaust and Genocide (Jerusalem), and the Institute for the Study of Genocide (NYC), have affirmed the historical fact of the Armenian Genocide”.[125]

For Turkish historians, supporting the national republican myth is essential to preserving Turkish national unity. The usual Turkish argument is that the deportations were necessary because the Armenians had allied themselves with the Russian army in wartime and that around 600,000 Armenians perished during the marches, largely due to isolated massacres, disease, or malnourishment.[126]“There was no genocide committed against the Armenians in the Ottoman Empire before or during World War I”.[127] Genocide scholars Roger Smith, Eric Markusen, and Robert Jay Lifton wrote inProfessional Ethics and the Denial of the Armenian Genocide (Holocaust and Genocide Studies): “Where scholars deny genocide in the face of decisive evidence … they contribute to false consciousness that can have the most dire reverberations. Their message, in effect, is … mass murder requires no confrontation, no reflection, but should be ignored, glossed over”.[128] Some dissident historians and scholars in Turkey, including Yektan Türkyilmaz, have been trying to reclaim the Armenians as part of Ottoman and Turkish history and acknowledge the wrongs done to the Armenians as a condition for reconciliation with them on the basis of confidence in Turkish national unity.[129]

Defining genocide

Hebrew University scholar Yehuda Bauer suggests of the Armenian Genocide, “This is the closest parallel to the Holocaust“.[130] He nonetheless distinguishes several key differences between the Holocaust and the Armenian Genocide, particularly in regard to motivation:

[T]he Nazis saw the Jews as the central problem of world history. Upon its solution depended the future of mankind. Unless International Jewry was defeated, human civilization would not survive. The attitude towards the Jews had in it important elements of pseudo-religion. There was no such motivation present in the Armenian case; Armenians were to be annihilated for power-political reasons, and in Turkey only … The differences between the holocaust and the Armenian massacres are less important than the similarities—and even if the Armenian case is not seen as a holocaust in the extreme form which it took towards Jews, it is certainly the nearest thing to it.[130]

Bauer has also suggested that the Armenian Genocide is best understood, not as having begun in 1915, but rather as “an ongoing genocide, from 1896, through 1908/9, through World War I and right up to 1923″.[131] Lucy Dawidowicz also alludes to these earlier massacres as at least as significant as those of the World War I era:

In 1897, when the Dreyfus Affair was tearing France apart, Bernard Lazare, a French Jew active in Dreyfus’s defense, addressed a group of Jewish students in Paris on the subject of anti-Semitism. “For the Christian peoples”, he remarked, “an Armenian solution” to their Jew-hatred was available. He was referring to the Turkish massacres of Armenians, which in their extent and horror most closely approximated the murder of European Jews. But, Lazare went on, “their sensibilities cannot allow them to envisage that”. The once unthinkable “Armenian solution” became, in our time, the achievable “Final Solution”, the Nazi code name for the annihilation of the European Jews.[132]

 

Commemoration of the Armenian Genocide, Armenian Church inVolgograd, Russia

Law professor Raphael Lemkin, who coined the term “genocide” in 1943, has stated that he did so with the fate of the Armenians in mind, explaining that “it happened so many times … It happened to the Armenians, then after the Armenians Hitler took action”.[133] Several international organizations have conducted studies of the atrocities, each in turn determining that the term “genocide” aptly describes “the Ottoman massacre of Armenians in 1915–16″.[134] Among the organizations affirming this conclusion are the International Center for Transitional Justice, the International Association of Genocide Scholars, and the United Nations’ Sub-Commission on Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Minorities.[134][135]

In 2002, the International Center for Transitional Justice (ICTJ) was asked by the Turkish Armenian Reconciliation Commission to provide a report on the applicability of the Genocide Convention to the controversy. An independent legal counsel drafted a memorandum for the ICTJ which stated that in its opinion “legal scholars as well as historians, politicians, journalists and other people would be justified in continuing to so describe [the events as genocide]” and further that the Republic of Turkey was not liable for the event.[136]

In 2005, the International Association of Genocide Scholars affirmed[137] that scholarly evidence revealed the “Young Turk government of the Ottoman Empire began a systematic genocide of its Armenian citizens – an unarmed Christian minority population. More than a million Armenians were exterminated through direct killing, starvation, torture, and forced death marches”. The IAGS also condemned Turkish attempts to deny the factual and moral reality of the Armenian Genocide. In 2007, the Elie Wiesel Foundation for Humanity produced a letter[138] signed by 53 Nobel Laureates re-affirming the Genocide Scholars’ conclusion that the 1915 killings of Armenians constituted genocide.[139][140]

Academic views within the Republic of Turkey are often at odds with international consensus: this may partly stem from the fact that to acknowledge the Armenian genocide in Turkey carries with it a risk of criminal prosecution. Many Turkish intellectuals have been prosecuted for characterizing the massacres as genocide.[141][142]

Audio recording of Section 3 of Martyred Armenia, by Fa’iz El-Ghusein. The section describes methods of massacre adopted by the Turkish Gendarmes and authorities.

Bat Ye’or has suggested that “the genocide of the Armenians was a jihad“.[143] Ye’or holds jihad and what she calls “dhimmitude” to be among the “principles and values” that led to the Armenian Genocide.[144] This perspective is challenged by Fà’iz el-Ghusein, a Bedouin Arab witness of the Armenian persecution, whose 1918 treatise aimed “to refute beforehand inventions and slanders against the Faith of Islam and against Moslems generally … [W]hat the Armenians have suffered is to be attributed to the Committee of Union and Progress … [I]t has been due to their nationalist fanaticism and their jealousy of the Armenians, and to these alone; the Faith of Islam is guiltless of their deeds”.[145]:49 Arnold Toynbee writes that “the Young Turks made Pan-Islamism and Turkish Nationalism work together for their ends, but the development of their policy shows the Islamic element receding and the Nationalist gaining ground”.[146] Toynbee, and various other sources, report that many Armenians were spared death by marrying into Turkish families or converting to Islam. El-Ghusein points out that many converts were put to death, concerned that Westerners would come to regard the “extermination of the Armenians”[145]:49 as “a black stain on the history of Islam, which ages will not efface”.[145]:51 In one instance, when an Islamic leader appealed to spare Armenian converts to Islam, El-Ghusein quotes a government functionary as responding that “politics have no religion”, before sending the converts to their deaths.[145]:49

Noam Chomsky has suggested that, rather than the Armenian Genocide having been relegated to the periphery of public awareness, “more people are aware of the Armenian genocide during the First World War than are aware of the Indonesian genocide in 1965″.[147] Taner Akçam‘s A Shameful Act has contextualized the Armenian Genocide with the desperate Ottoman struggle at Gallipoli, suggesting that panic of imminent destruction caused Ottoman authorities to opt for deportation and extermination.[32]:125–8

On 10 October 2009 in Zürich, despite overwhelming opposition by Armenians in Armenia and in the Diaspora, the Armenian government signed the Armenia-Turkey Protocols, one of the provisions of which stipulates the establishment of a research commission “to study the two countries’ historical grievances”.[148] The agreement must still be ratified by the parliaments of both countries in order to take effect.

Just a day before, on 9 October 2009 in London, Geoffrey Robertson QC, eminent jurist, barrister and judge, published a detailed legal opinion[149] which comprehensively and methodically countered the British Government’s reasons for not formally recognizing the Armenian Genocide.

Republic of Turkey and the Genocide

According to Kemal Çiçek, the head of the Armenian Research Group at the Turkish Historical Society, in Turkey there is no official thesis on the Armenian issue.[150] The Republic of Turkey‘s formal stance is that the deaths of Armenians during the “relocation” or “deportation” cannot aptly be deemed “genocide”, a position that has been supported with a plethora of diverging justifications: that the killings were not deliberate or systematically orchestrated; that the killings were justified because Armenians posed a Russian-sympathizing threat[151] as a cultural group; that the Armenians merely starved to death, or any of various characterizations referring to marauding “Armenian gangs”.[152] Some suggestions seek to invalidate the genocide on semantic or anachronistic grounds (the word “genocide” was not coined until 1943). Turkish World War I casualty figures are often cited to mitigate the effect of the number of Armenian dead.[153]

Volkan Vural, retired ambassador of Turkey to Germany and Spain, says that the Turkish state should apologize for what happened to the Armenians during the deportations of 1915 and what happened to the Greeks during the Istanbul Pogrom.[154][155] He also states, “I think that, the Armenian issue can be solved by politicians and not by historians. I don’t believe that historical facts about this issue is not revealed. The historical facts are already known. The most important point here is that how this facts will be interpreted and will affect the future”.[154]

Turkish governmental sources have asserted that the historically demonstrated “tolerance of Turkish people” itself renders the Armenian Genocide an impossibility.[156] One military document leverages 11th century history to cast doubt on the Armenian Genocide: “It was the Seljuq Turks who saved the Armenians that came under the Turkish domination in 1071 from the Byzantine persecution and granted them the right to live as a man should”.[156] A Der Spiegel article addressed this modern Turkish conception of history thus:

“Would you admit to the crimes of your grandfathers, if these crimes didn’t really happen?” asked ambassador Öymen. But the problem lies precisely in this question, says Hrant Dink, publisher and editor-in-chief of the Istanbul-based Armenian weekly Agos. Turkey’s bureaucratic elite have never really shed themselves of the Ottoman tradition — in the perpetrators, they see their fathers, whose honor they seek to defend. This tradition instills a sense of identity in Turkish nationalists — both from the left and the right, and it is passed on from generation to generation through the school system. This tradition also requires an antipole against which it could define itself. Since the times of the Ottoman Empire, religious minorities have been pushed into this role.[157]

In 2007, Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan issued a circular that calls the government institutions to use “Events of 1915″ (in Turkish, 1915 Olayları) phrase instead of the “so-called Armenian genocide” (in Turkish, sözde Ermeni soykırımı) phrase.[158]

Turkey has started an “Initiative to Resolve Armenian Allegations Regarding 1915″ by using archives in Turkey, Armenia and other countries.[159] Armenian president Robert Kocharian rejected this offer by saying, “It is the responsibility of governments to develop bilateral relations and we do not have the right to delegate that responsibility to historians. That is why we have proposed and propose again that, without pre-conditions, we establish normal relations between our two countries”.[160] Additionally, Turkish foreign minister of the time, Abdullah Gül, invited the United States and other countries to contribute to such a commission by appointing scholars to “investigate this tragedy and open ways for Turks and Armenians to come together”.[161]

The Turkish government continues to protest against the formal recognition of the genocide by other countries and to dispute that there ever was a genocide.

Controversies

Efforts by the Turkish government and its agents to quash mention of the genocide have resulted in numerous scholarly, diplomatic, political and legal controversies.

In 1973 Turkey recalled its ambassador to France to protest the Genocide monument erected in Marseilles “to the memory of the 1.5 million Armenian victims of the genocide ordered by the Turkish rulers in 1915″.[162]

In 1973, the Sub-Commission on Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Minorities, a former UN body, mandated special rapporteur Nicodème Ruhashyankiko to produce a report on the issue of genocide. Early drafts of Ruhashyankiko’s report referred to the World War I era Ottoman massacre of Armenians as genocide, but that reference disappeared from his final report (1978) under pressure from Turkey.[163]

The Israeli Foreign Ministry attempted to prevent any mention of the Armenian Genocide at an international conference on genocide held in Tel Aviv in 1982. Several reports suggested that Turkey had warned that Turkish Jews might face “reprisals” if the conference permitted Armenian participation.[164] This charge was “categorically denied” by Turkey;[165] the Israeli Foreign Ministry supported Turkey’s protestation that there had been no threats against Jews, suggesting that its intervention in the genocide conference was based on considerations “vital to the Jewish nation”.[166]

In the same year (1982), the Institute of Turkish Studies in Washington, D.C. (ITS) was established by a $3 million grant from the Turkish Government. Israel Charny identifies ITS and some of its foremost deniers of the Armenian genocide, such as Stanford Shaw, Heath W. Lowry, and Justin McCarthy, as the Turkish government’s principal agency in USA for promoting research on Turkey and the Ottoman Empire, but also denial of the Armenian Genocide.[167]

A 1989 U.S. Senate proposal to recognize the Armenian Genocide stoked the ire of Turkey. The proposal occurred in the context of the publication of internal U.S. documents which laid out a State Department official’s eyewitness report that “thousands and thousands of Armenians, mostly innocent and helpless women and children, were butchered”, in the last days of the Ottoman Empire. Turkey responded by blocking United States Navy visits to Turkey and suspending some US military training facilities on Turkish territory. The American scholar who assembled the US archive documents for publication went into hiding after a series of anonymous threats.[168]

In 1990, psychologist Robert Jay Lifton received a letter from the Turkish Ambassador to the United States, questioning his inclusion of references to the Armenian Genocide in one of his books. The ambassador inadvertently included a draft of the letter, presented by scholar Heath W. Lowry, advising the ambassador on how to prevent mention of the Armenian Genocide in scholarly works.[169] In 1996, Lowry was named to a chair at Princeton University that had been financed by the Turkish government, sparking a debate on ethics in scholarship.[128][170]

In 1993, Ragıp Zarakolu a Turkish human rights activist published the Turkish translation of the book called History of the Genocide written by Yves Ternon. The book was the first to be published in Turkey that openly acknowledged the event in 1915 as Genocide. Soon after its publication, he received threats and in 1994, the publishing firm of Ragıp Zorakolu was the target of a bomb attack.[171]

Prosecutors acting on their own initiative have used Article 301 of the Turkish Penal Code prohibiting “insulting Turkishness” to silence a number of prominent Turkish intellectuals who spoke of atrocities suffered by Armenians in the last days of the Ottoman Empire (most of these cases have been dismissed).[172] During a February 2005 interview with Das Magazin, novelist Orhan Pamuk made statements implicating Turkey in massacres against Armenians and persecution of the Kurds, declaring: “Thirty thousand Kurds and a million Armenians were killed in these lands and nobody but me dares to talk about it”. Subjected to a hate campaign, he left Turkey, before returning in 2005 to defend his right to freedom of speech: “What happened to the Ottoman Armenians in 1915 was a major thing that was hidden from the Turkish nation; it was a taboo. But we have to be able to talk about the past”.[173] Lawyers of two Turkish ultranationalist professional associations led by Kemal Kerinçsiz then brought criminal charges against Pamuk.[174] However, on 23 January 2006 the charges of “insulting Turkishness” were dropped (for reasons which are not necessarily tied to the case), a move welcomed by the EU.[175] That the charges had been brought at all was still a matter of contention for European politicians.

These prosecutions have often been accompanied by hate campaigns and threats, as was the case for Hrant Dink, who was prosecuted three times for “denigrating Turkishness“, and murdered in 2007.[176] Later, photographs of the assassin being honored as a hero while in police custody, posing in front of the Turkish flag with grinning policemen,[177] gave the academic community still more cause for pause with regard to engaging the Armenian issue.[178] The leading lawyer behind the prosecutions, Kemal Kerinçsiz, has been accused of plotting to overthrow the government as a member of the alleged Ergenekon network.

After a meeting with then UK Prime Minister Gordon Brown in 2010, Turkey’s PM announced that the Turkish Government might order the expulsion of all illegal Armenian immigrants from Turkey. The statement came after recent US House Committee and Swedish Parliament resolutions over the Armenian Genocide affirmation. He repeated the statement in a BBC interview immediately afterwards, declaring that there were 100,000 illegal Armenian citizens living in Turkey and that:

If necessary, I may have to tell these 100,000 to go back to their country because they are not my citizens. I don’t have to keep them in my country.[179][180]

Armenian Prime Minister Tigran Sargsyan responded to Erdoğan’s statement by saying that this kind of threat reminded Armenians of the Armenian Genocide and that it does not improve relations between the two countries.[181] The exact number of illegal Armenians in Turkey is estimated to be only 12,000 – 13,000, contrary to the figure used by the Turkish prime minister.[182]

Armenia and the Genocide

Armenia has been involved in a protracted ethnic-territorial conflict with Azerbaijan, a Turkic state, since Azerbaijan became independent from the Soviet Union in 1991. The conflict has featured several pogroms, massacres, and waves of ethnic cleansing, by both sides. Some foreign policy observers and historians have suggested that Armenia and the Armenian diaspora have sought to portray the modern conflict as a continuation of the Armenian Genocide, in order to influence modern policy-making in the region.[82][183]:232–3 According to Thomas Ambrosio, the Armenian Genocide furnishes “a reserve of public sympathy and moral legitimacy that translates into significant political influence … to elicit congressional support for anti-Azerbaijan policies”.[183]

The rhetoric leading up to the onset of the conflict, which unfolded in the context of several pogroms of Armenians, was dominated by references to the Armenian Genocide, including fears that it would be, or was in the course of being, repeated.[184][185] During the conflict, the Azeri and Armenian governments regularly accused each other of genocidal intent, although these claims have been treated skeptically by outside observers.[82]:232–3

The worldwide recognition of the Genocide is a core aspect of Armenia’s foreign policy and overarching grand strategy.[186]

Recognition of the Genocide

Main article: Armenian Genocide recognitionCouncil of Europe Parliamentary Assembly Resolution, 24 April 1998

Today we commemorate the anniversary of what has been called the first genocide of the 20th century, and we salute the memory of the Armenian victims of this crime against humanity“.[17]

As a response to the continuing denial of the Armenian Genocide by the Turkish State, many activists among Armenian Diaspora communities have pushed for formal recognition of the Armenian genocide from various governments around the world. 22 countries and 42 U.S. states have adopted resolutions acknowledging the Armenian Genocide as a bona fide historical event. On 4 March 2010, a US congressional panel narrowly voted that the incident was indeed genocide; within minutes the Turkish government issued a statement critical of “this resolution which accuses the Turkish nation of a crime it has not committed”. The Armenian Assembly of America (AAA) and the single largest organisation with the AAA the Armenian National Committee of America(ANCA) have as their main lobbying agenda to press Congress and the President of the United States for an increase of economic aid for Armenia (already the second largest per capita after Israel) and the reduction of economic and military assistance for Turkey. The efforts also include reaffirmation of a genocide by Ottoman Turkey in 1915.[187]

Despite his previous public recognition and support of Genocide bills, as well as the election campaign promises to formally recognize the Armenian Genocide,[188]the U.S. President, Barack Obama, although repeating that his views on the issue have not changed, has thus far abstained from using the term “genocide”.[189] On 24 April commemoration speeches President Obama has yet referred to the Armenian Genocide only by the Armenian synonym Metz Eghern (“Mec Eġeṙn”).

Cultural loss

The premeditated destruction of objects of Armenian cultural, religious, historical and communal heritage was yet another key purpose of both the genocide itself and the post-genocidal campaign of denial. Armenian churches and monasteries were destroyed or changed into mosques, Armenian cemeteries flattened, and, in several cities (e.g. Van), Armenian quarters were demolished.[190]

Aside from the deaths, Armenians lost their wealth and property without compensation.[191] Businesses and farms were lost, and all schools, churches, hospitals, orphanages, monasteries, and graveyards became Turkish state property.[191] In January 1916, the Ottoman Minister of Commerce and Agriculture issued a decree ordering all financial institutions operating within the empire’s borders to turn over Armenian assets to the government.[192] It is recorded that as much as 6 million Turkish gold pounds were seized along with real property, cash, bank deposits, and jewelry.[192] The assets were then funneled to European banks, including Deutsche and Dresdner banks.[192]

After the end of World War I, Genocide survivors tried to return and reclaim their former homes and assets, but were driven out by the Ankara Government.[191]

In 1914, the Armenian Patriarch in Constantinople presented a list of the Armenian holy sites under his supervision. The list contained 2,549 religious places of which 200 were monasteries while 1,600 were churches. In 1974 UNESCO stated that after 1923, out of 913 Armenian historical monuments left in Eastern Turkey, 464 have vanished completely, 252 are in ruins, and 197 are in need of repair (in stable conditions).[193][194]

Armenian Genocide reparations

The grounds of the International Law

The United Nations Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to Reparation for Victims of Gross Violations of Human Rights and International Humanitarian Law provide in part, that reparation may be claimed individually and where appropriate collectively, by the direct victims of violations of human rights and international humanitarian law, the immediate family, dependants or other persons or groups of persons closely connected with the direct victims.[195] According to Henry Theriault, while current members of Turkish society cannot be blamed morally for the destruction of Armenians, present-dayRepublic of Turkey, as successor state to the Ottoman Empire and as beneficiary of the wealth and land expropriations brought forth through the genocide, is responsible for reparations.[196]

Particularly important are Principles 9 and 12 that state, that civil claims relating to reparations for gross violations of human rights and international humanitarian law shall not be subject to statutes of limitations (article 9), and that restitution shall be provided to re-establish the situation that existed prior to the violations of human rights or international humanitarian law. The restitution requires, inter alia – return to one’s place of residence and restoration of property.[195][197]

Professor of International Law of Geneva School of Diplomacy (J.D. – Harvard, Dr.phil. – Göttingen), former Secretary of the UN Human Rights Committee and former Chief of Petitions at the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Dr. Alfred de Zayas stated that, because of the continuing character of the crime of genocide in factual and legal terms, the remedy of restitution has not been foreclosed. Thus the survivors of the genocide against the Armenians, both individually and collectively, have standing to advance a claim for restitution. Whenever possible complete restitution or restoration to the previous condition should be granted. But where it is not possible, relevant compensation may be substituted as a remedy. [198]

In an article published in the European Journal of International Law, Vahagn Avedian, leaving aside the limitations of the UN Genocide Convention, emphasizes the applicability of international laws that prevailed at the time and remain in force up to the present, e.g. the Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907, more specifically the Martens Clause, pertaining to the protection of civilian population, but also existing international laws on unlawful confiscation, etc. Thus, the actions of the Turkish governments (the Ottoman, the insurgent nationalist movement as well as the succeeding republic), should be viewed from the perspective of Internationally Wrongful Acts. Avedian argues that:

the Republic not only failed to stop doing the wrongful acts of its predecessor, but it also continued the very internationally wrongful acts committed by the Young Turk government. Thus, the insurgent National Movement, which later became the Republic, made itself responsible for not only its own wrongful acts but also those of its predecessor, including the act of genocide committed in 1915–1916.[199]

Sèvres Treaty

Although there are different opinions on the legitimacy of the Treaty of Sèvres and its relativity to reparation claims, there are specialists who claim that some of its elements retain the force of law.[200]In particular, the fixing of the proper borders of an Armenian state was undertaken pursuant to the treaty and determined by a binding arbitral award, regardless of whether the treaty was ultimately ratified. The committee process determining the arbitral award was agreed to by the parties and, according to international law, the resulting determination has legal force regardless of the ultimate fate of the treaty.[196]

Lawsuits

In July 2004, after the California State Legislature passed the Armenian Genocide Insurance Act, descendants of Armenian Genocide victims settled a case for about 2,400 life insurance policies fromNew York Life written on Armenians living in the Ottoman Empire.[201] Around 1918, the Turkish government attempted to recover payments for the people it had killed, with the argument that there were no identifiable heirs to the policy holders. The settlement provided $20 million, of which $11 million was for heirs of the Genocide victims.[2

Commemoration

The Armenian Genocide Memorial, better known as Tsitsernakaberd, is Armenia’s official memorial to the victims of the genocide.

Memorials

Over 135 memorials, spread across 25 countries, commemorate the Armenian Genocide.[202]

In 1965, the 50th anniversary of the genocide, a 24-hour mass protest was initiated in Yerevan demanding recognition of the Armenian Genocide by Soviet authorities. The memorial was completed two years later, at Tsitsernakaberd above the Hrazdan gorge in Yerevan. The 44 metres (144 ft) stele symbolizes the national rebirth of Armenians. Twelve slabs are positioned in a circle, representing 12 lost provinces in present day Turkey. At the center of the circle there is aneternal flame. Each 24 April, hundreds of thousands of people walk to the genocide monument and lay flowers around the eternal flame.

Another memorial, in Alfortville, France, near Paris, was bombed on 3 May 1984, by a hit-team headed by Grey Wolves member Abdullah Çatlı and paid by theTurkish intelligence agency (MİT).[203]

The Armenian Genocide Memorial, better known as Tsitsernakaberd, is Armenia’s official memorial to the victims of the genocide.
File:Ravished Armenia FULL MOVIE.ogv

Representation in culture

File:Ravished Armenia FULL MOVIE.ogv

“Ravished Armenia” (sometimes called “Auction of Souls”) was produced by the American Committee for Armenian and Syrian Relief in 1919 and is based on the narrative account ofAurora Mardiganian, an Armenian Genocide survivor. This newly restored 24 minute full segment of the movie includes music, an introduction, 125 subtitles and a slide show of black and white production stills.

The first artwork known to have been influenced by the Armenian Genocide was a medal struck in St. Petersburg while the massacres and deportations of 1915 were at their height. It was issued as a token of Russian sympathy for Armenian suffering. Since then, dozens of similar medals have been commissioned in various countries.[204]

Numerous eyewitness accounts of the atrocities were published, notably those of Swedish missionary Alma Johansson and U.S. Ambassador Henry Morgenthau, Sr. German medic Armin Wegner wrote several books about the atrocities he witnessed while stationed in the Ottoman Empire. Years later, having returned to Germany, Wegner was imprisoned for opposing Nazism,[205] and his books were burnt by the Nazis.[206] Probably the best known literary work on the Armenian Genocide is Franz Werfel‘s 1933 The Forty Days of Musa Dagh. It was a bestseller that became particularly popular among the youth of the Jewish ghettos during the Nazi era.[67]:302–4

Kurt Vonnegut‘s 1988 novel Bluebeard features the Armenian Genocide as an underlying theme. Other novels incorporating the Armenian Genocide include Louis de BerniéresBirds without Wings, Edgar Hilsenrath‘s German-language The Story of the Last Thought, and Polish Stefan Żeromski‘s 1925 The Spring to Come. A story in Edward Saint-Ivan’s 2006 anthology “The Black Knight’s God” includes a fictional survivor of the Armenian Genocide.

The first film about the Armenian Genocide appeared in 1919, a Hollywood production titled Ravished Armenia. It resonated with acclaimed director Atom Egoyan, influencing his 2002 Ararat. There are also references in Elia Kazan‘s America, America and Henri Verneuil‘s Mayrig. At the Berlin Film Festival of 2007 Italian directors Paolo and Vittorio Taviani presented another film about the atrocities, based on Antonia Arslan’s book, La Masseria Delle Allodole (The Farm of the Larks).[207] Richard Kalinoski’s play, Beast on the Moon, is about two Armenian Genocide survivors.

The paintings of Armenian-American Arshile Gorky, a seminal figure of Abstract Expressionism, are considered to have been influenced by the suffering and loss of the period.[208] In 1915, at age 10, Gorky fled his native Van and escaped to Russian-Armenia with his mother and three sisters, only to have his mother die of starvation in Yerevan in 1919. His two The Artist and His Mother paintings are based on a photograph with his mother taken in Van.

Arshile Gorky‘s The Artist and His Mother (ca. 1926–36)

In 1975, famous French-Armenian singer Charles Aznavour recorded the song “Ils sont tombés” (“They Fell”), dedicated to the memory of Armenian Genocide victims.[209]

American composer and singer Daniel Decker has achieved critical acclaim for his collaborations with Armenian composer Ara Gevorgyan. The song “Adana”, named for the province of a 1909 pogrom of the Armenian people, tells the story of the Armenian Genocide. “Adana” has been translated into 17 languages and recorded by singers around the world.[210]

The American band System of a Down, composed of four descendants of Armenian Genocide survivors, has promoted awareness of the Armenian Genocide through its lyrics, including P.L.U.C.K. and in concerts.[211]

In late 2003, Diamanda Galás released the album Defixiones, Will and Testament: Orders from the Dead, an 80-minute memorial tribute to the Armenian, Assyrian and Greek victims of the genocide in Turkey. “The performance is an angry meditation on genocide and the politically cooperative denial of it, in particular the Turkish and American denial of the Armenian, Assyrian, and Anatolian Greek genocides from 1914 to 1923″.[212]

In 2008, Armenian-American composer Andrey Kasparov premiered Tsitsernakabert, an original work for modern dance and six musicians: alto flute, bass/ contrabass flute, violin, two percussionists, and mezzo-soprano.[213] The work opens with eight dancers posed in a circle – inclined toward the circle’s centre – in a tableau reminiscent of the eponymous memorial to victims of the Armenian Genocide, situated in Yerevan, capital of Armenia.[214][215]

Julian Cope‘s 2013 album Revolutionary Suicide includes a song over 15 minutes long, “The Armenian Genocide”, memorializing the event.

Images

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 514 other followers

%d bloggers like this: